Advertisement
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Effect of age, gender, and body mass index on incidence and satisfaction of a Popeye deformity following biceps tenotomy or tenodesis: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

      Background

      The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of Popeye deformity following biceps tenotomy vs. tenodesis and evaluate risk factors and subjective and objective outcomes.

      Methods

      Data for this study were collected as part of a randomized clinical trial in which patients aged ≥18 years undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery for a long head of the biceps tendon lesion were allocated to undergo tenotomy or tenodesis. The primary outcome measure for this secondary analysis was rate of Popeye deformity at 24 months postoperation as determined by an evaluator blinded to group allocation. Those with a deformity indicated their satisfaction with the appearance of their arm on a 10-cm visual analog scale, rated their pain and cramping, and completed the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index. Isometric elbow flexion and supination strength were also measured. Cohen kappa was calculated to measure inter-rater reliability between patient and evaluator on the presence of a deformity. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of presence or absence of a Popeye deformity.

      Results

      One hundred fourteen patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups, of which 42 to the tenodesis group and 45 to the tenotomy group completed a 24-month follow-up. Based on clinical observation, the odds of a Popeye in the tenotomy group were 4.3 times greater than in the tenodesis group (P = .018) with incidence of 33% (15/45) and 9.5% (4/42), respectively. Surgical technique was the only significant predictor of perceived deformity, with male gender trending toward significance (odds ratio 7.33, 95% confidence interval 0.867-61.906, P = .067). Mean (standard deviation) satisfaction score of those with a deformity regarding appearance of their arm was 7.3 (2.6). Increasing satisfaction was correlated with increasing age (r = 0.640, P = .025), but there was no association with gender (r = −0.155, P = .527) or body mass index (r = −0.221, P = .057). Differences in subjective outcomes were dependent on whether the Popeye was clinician- or self-assessed.

      Conclusion

      The odds of developing a perceived Popeye deformity was 4.3 higher after tenotomy compared to tenodesis based on clinician observation. Male gender was trending toward being predictive of having a deformity. Pain and cramping were increased in those with a self-reported Popeye. Younger patients were significantly less satisfied with a deformity despite no difference in functional outcomes at 24 months. Thus, biceps tenodesis may be favored in younger male patients to minimize the risk of Popeye and the risk of dissatisfaction in the appearance of their arm following surgery.

      Level of Evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Aflatooni J.O.
        • Meeks B.D.
        • Froehle A.W.
        • Bonner K.F.
        Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction.
        J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15: 56https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-1581-3
        • Almeida A.
        • Gobbi L.F.
        • de Almeida N.C.
        • Agostini A.P.
        • Garcia A.F.
        Prevalence of Popeye deformity after long head biceps tenotomy and tenodesis.
        Acta Ortop Bras. 2019; 27: 265-268https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220192705216649
        • Belay E.S.
        • Wittstein J.R.
        • Garrigues G.E.
        • Lassiter T.E.
        • Scribani M.
        • Goldner R.D.
        • et al.
        Biceps tenotomy has earlier pain relief compared to biceps tenodesis: a randomized prospective study.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27: 4032-4037https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05682-1
        • Boileau P.
        • Baqué F.
        • Valerio L.
        • Ahrens P.
        • Chuinard C.
        • Trojani C.
        Isolated arthroscopic biceps tenotomy or tenodesis improves symptoms in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 747-757https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.01097
        • Bradbury T.
        • Dunn W.R.
        • Kuhn J.E.
        Preventing the Popeye deformity after release of the long head of the biceps tendon: an alternative technique and biomechanical evaluation.
        Arthroscopy. 2008; 24: 1099-1102https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2008.06.002
        • Castricini R.
        • Familiari F.
        • De Gori M.
        • Riccelli D.A.
        • De Benedetto M.
        • Orlando N.
        • et al.
        Tenodesis is not superior to tenotomy in the treatment of the long head of biceps tendon lesions.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26: 169-175https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4609-4
        • Cho N.S.
        • Cha S.W.
        • Rhee Y.G.
        Funnel tenotomy versus intracuff tenodesis for lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon associated with rotator cuff tears.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 1161-1168https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514523719
        • Clement X.
        • Baldairon F.
        • Clavert P.
        • Kempf J.F.
        Popeye sign: tenodesis vs. self-locking “T” tenotomy of the long head of the biceps.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018; 104: 23-26https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.09.016
        • De Carli A.
        • Vadalà A.
        • Zanzotto E.
        • Zampar G.
        • Vetrano M.
        • Iorio R.
        • et al.
        Reparable rotator cuff tears with concomitant long-head biceps lesions: tenotomy or tenotomy/tenodesis?.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20: 2553-2558https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-1918-5
        • Delle Rose G.
        • Borroni M.
        • Silvestro A.
        • Garofalo R.
        • Conti M.
        • De Nittis P.
        • et al.
        The long head of biceps as a source of pain in active population: tenotomy or tenodesis? A comparison of 2 case series with isolated lesions.
        Musculoskelet Surg. 2012; 96: S47-S52https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-012-0189-0
        • Duff S.J.
        • Campbell P.T.
        Patient acceptance of long head of biceps brachii tenotomy.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21: 61-65https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.014
        • Fang J.
        • Dai X.
        • Yu X.
        • Luo J.
        • Liu X.
        • Zhang M.
        • et al.
        Lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon concomitant with rotator cuff tears: tenotomy or subpectoral mini-open tenodesis? A comparative short to mid-term follow-up study.
        Orthop Surg. 2019; 11: 857-863https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12536
        • Frost A.
        • Zafar M.S.
        • Maffulli N.
        Tenotomy versus tenodesis in the management of pathologic lesions of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii.
        Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 828-833https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508322179
        • García-Rellán J.E.
        • Sánchez-Alepuz E.
        • Mudarra-García J.
        Increased fatigue of the biceps after tenotomy of the long head of biceps tendon.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26: 3826-3831https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5007-2
        • Ge H.
        • Zhang Q.
        • Sun Y.
        • Li J.
        • Sun L.
        • Cheng B.
        Tenotomy or tenodesis for the long head of biceps lesions in shoulders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0121286https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121286
        • Godenèche A.
        • Kempf J.F.
        • Nové-Josserand L.
        • Michelet A.
        • Saffarini M.
        • Hannink G.
        • et al.
        Tenodesis renders better results than tenotomy in repairs of isolated supraspinatus tears with pathologic biceps.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27: 1939-1945https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.030
        • Hsu A.R.
        • Ghodadra N.S.
        • Provencher M.T.
        • Lewis P.B.
        • Bach B.R.
        Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanical results.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20: 326-332https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.019
        • Hufeland M.
        • Wicke S.
        • Verde P.E.
        • Krauspe R.
        • Patzer T.
        Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy in isolated LHB lesions: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019; 139: 961-970https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03136-4
        • Kelly A.M.
        • Drakos M.C.
        • Fealy S.
        • Taylor S.A.
        • O’Brien S.J.
        Arthroscopic release of the long head of the biceps tendon: functional outcome and clinical results.
        Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33: 208-213https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546504269555
        • Kim Y.J.
        • Kwon O.
        • Lee H.R.
        • Kim S.H.
        Distal pullout strengths of the biceps long head tendon for different adjacent tissue and tendon pathologies during rotator cuff repair.
        Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018: 4267163https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4267163
        • Kirkley A.
        • Alvarez C.
        • Griffin S.
        The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for disorders of the rotator cuff: the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index.
        Clin J Sport Med. 2003; 13: 84-92https://doi.org/10.1097/00042752-200303000-00004
        • Lee H.J.
        • Jeong J.Y.
        • Kim C.K.
        • Kim Y.S.
        Surgical treatment of lesions of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon with rotator cuff tear: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the clinical results of tenotomy and tenodesis.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25: 1107-1114https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.006
        • Lim T.K.
        • Moon E.S.
        • Koh K.H.
        • Yoo J.C.
        Patient-related factors and complications after arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon.
        Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 783-789https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510388158
        • MacDonald P.
        • Verhulst F.
        • McRae S.
        • Old J.
        • Stranges G.
        • Dubberley J.
        • et al.
        Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy in the treatment of lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48: 1439-1449https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520912212
        • Meraner D.
        • Sternberg C.
        • Vega J.
        • Hahne J.
        • Kleine M.
        • Leuzinger J.
        Arthroscopic tenodesis versus tenotomy of the long head of biceps tendon in simultaneous rotator cuff repair.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016; 136: 101-106https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2343-2
        • Osbahr D.C.
        • Diamond A.B.
        • Speer K.P.
        The cosmetic appearance of the biceps muscle after long-head tenotomy versus tenodesis.
        Arthroscopy. 2002; 18: 483-487https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2002.32233
        • Rhee S.-M.
        • Jeong H.Y.
        • Ro K.
        • Pancholi S.
        • Rhee Y.G.
        Double on-lay fixation using all suture-type anchor for subpectoral biceps tenodesis has favorable functional outcomes and leads to less cosmetic deformities than single on-lay fixation.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27: 4005-4013https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05663-4
        • Richards R.R.
        • An K.N.
        • Bigliani L.U.
        • Friedman R.J.
        • Gartsman G.M.
        • Gristina A.G.
        • et al.
        A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994; 3: 347-352
        • Roddy E.
        • Zhang W.
        • Doherty M.
        Validation of a self-report instrument for assessment of hallux valgus.
        Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007; 15: 1008-1012https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2007.02.016
        • Slenker N.R.
        • Lawson K.
        • Ciccotti M.G.
        • Dodson C.C.
        • Cohen S.B.
        Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: clinical outcomes.
        Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 576-582https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.017
        • Virk M.S.
        • Nicholson G.P.
        Complications of proximal biceps tenotomy and tenodesis.
        Clin Sports Med. 2016; 35: 181-188https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2015.08.011
        • Walch G.
        • Edwards T.B.
        • Boulahia A.
        • Nové-Josserand L.
        • Neyton L.
        • Szabo I.
        Arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: clinical and radiographic results of 307 cases.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14: 238-246https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.07.008
        • Zhang Q.
        • Zhou J.
        • Ge H.
        • Cheng B.
        Tenotomy or tenodesis for long head biceps lesions in shoulders with reparable rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomised trial.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 23: 464-469https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2587-8