Advertisement
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Endoscopic anatomy of distal biceps tendon insertion and bicipitoradial bursa: a cadaveric study

Published:January 21, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.11.033

      Background

      Distal biceps endoscopy has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open procedures for distal biceps tendon (DBT) pathology. The purpose of this study was to systematically describe the static and dynamic appearance and variations of the DBT insertional region using a standardized endoscopic technique and dissection in healthy cadaveric elbows.

      Methods

      Endoscopic assessment of the DBT insertional region was performed using a standard proximal parabiceps portal in 20 fresh frozen cadaveric upper extremities. A 6-point endoscopic evaluation of the DBT and bicipitoradial bursa was performed in a static supination position and with dynamic rotation. Anatomic variations in the DBT insertional characteristics, as well as the extent and appearance of the intrabursal space, were documented. Each cadaver was then dissected to correlate endoscopic findings with gross anatomic structures.

      Results

      A bare oval tuberosity area (n = 20) bounded by the supinator and DBT was observed. The DBT inserted ulnar to the bare area (n = 16) and the presence of an intervening wide (n = 1) or narrow (n = 3) tuberosity sulcus were documented. The dorsoradial DBT surface was consistently intrabursal and was differentiated into 2-5 fiber bundles (n = 15). The volar-ulnar DBT surface was always extrabursal and was associated with endoscopically identifiable proximal and distal fat pads. The bicipitoradial bursa formed a bursal sac that was attached to the dorsoradial (n = 13) or volar (n = 7) aspect of the tuberosity and extended proximally along the DBT for 3-5 cm (parabiceps space). A distinct ligament-like band (transverse radioulnar ligament) extended transversely across the proximal radioulnar space and appeared to form a sling that provided ulnar support to the DBT during dynamic rotation. The intact DBT surface was robust and could not be breached, even with firm pressure using a probe.

      Conclusions

      The bare tuberosity area, the bursal sac, and the parabiceps space are consistent anatomic landmarks that can be used during DBT endoscopy. An insertional tuberosity sulcus and DBT surface differentiation are normal anatomic variations. The transverse radioulnar ligament provides ulnar support for the DBT during pronation and forms a pulley mechanism for smooth tendon gliding motion.

      Level of evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bhatia D.N.
        Endoscopic repair of acute and chronic retracted distal biceps ruptures.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2016; 4: e501-e507https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.09.008
        • Bhatia D.N.
        Endoscopic distal biceps repair: endoscopic anatomy and dual-anchor repair using a proximal anterolateral "parabiceps portal".
        Arthrosc Tech. 2015; 10: e785-e793https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2015.07.031
        • Bhatia D.N.
        • DasGupta B.
        • Panjwani T.
        Cadaveric study of anterior and posterior elbow endoscopy portals for endoscopic distal biceps repair: comparative anatomy-at-risk.
        Surg Radiol Anat. 2016; 38: 781-791https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-016-1637-6
        • Bhatia D.N.
        • Kandhari V.
        Analysis of technical feasibility and neurovascular safety of endoscopic distal biceps repair: a cadaveric study.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27: 2057-2067https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.020
        • Eames M.J.
        • Bain G.I.
        Distal biceps tendon endoscopy and anterior elbow arthroscopy portal.
        Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006; 7: 139-142
        • Grégory T.
        • Roure P.
        • Fontès D.
        Repair of distal biceps tendon rupture using a suture anchor: description of a new endoscopic procedure.
        Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 506-511https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508326985
        • Kruger N.
        • Phadnis J.
        • Bhatia D.
        • Amasooriya M.
        • Bain G.I.
        Acute distal biceps tendon ruptures: anatomy, pathology and management—state of the art.
        J ISAKOS. 2020; 5: 304-313https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2019-000279
        • Phadnis J.
        • Bain G.
        Endoscopic-assisted distal biceps footprint repair.
        Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2015; 19: 55-59https://doi.org/10.1097/BTH.0000000000000078
        • Sharma S.
        • MacKay G.
        Endoscopic repair of distal biceps tendon using an EndoButton.
        Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 897.e1-897.e4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.04.001
        • Skaf A.Y.
        • Boutin R.D.
        • Dantas R.W.
        • Hooper A.W.
        • Muhle C.
        • Chou D.S.
        • et al.
        Bicipitoradial bursitis: MR imaging findings in eight patients and anatomic data from contrast material opacification of bursae followed by routine radiography and MR imaging in cadavers.
        Radiology. 1999; 212: 111-116
        • Vandenberghe M.
        • van Riet R.
        Distal biceps ruptures: open and endoscopic techniques.
        Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016; 9: 215-223https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-016-9330-2