Advertisement
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Three-dimensional evaluation of scapular morphology in primary glenohumeral arthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, and asymptomatic shoulders

Published:December 02, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.027

      Background

      Recently, the 3-dimensional (3D) morphology of the coracoacromial complex in nonpathologic shoulders has been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the coracoacromial complex in pathologic shoulders (glenohumeral osteoarthritis [GHOA] and cuff tear arthropathy [CTA]) and nonpathologic shoulders.

      Methods

      A 3D computed tomography reconstruction of 205 scapulae was performed (49 with GHOA, 48 with CTA, and 108 in normal shoulders [NL]). Subsequently, the center of the glenoid circle and several points at the coracoid, acromion, and glenoid were determined. The distances between these points and the rotation of the coracoacromial complex were calculated, and the acromion-glenoid angle was measured.

      Results

      The acromial overhang was significantly different between the NL (37 mm) and CTA (35 mm) groups (P = .045), as well as between the CTA and GHOA groups (33 mm) (P = .010). The acromion-glenoid angle showed a significant difference between the NL (mean, 50°) and GHOA (mean, 42°) groups (P < .001) and between the CTA (mean, 50°) and GHOA groups (P < .001). Furthermore, a significant difference was found in the acromial height, which was larger in the GHOA group (36 mm) than in the CTA group (30 mm) (P < .001) or NL group (30 mm) (P < .001).

      Conclusion

      This 3D morphologic study showed that the acromial part of the complex was turned more posteriorly in both pathologic groups. Furthermore, we found the coracoacromial complex to be more cranial to the glenoid center in the GHOA group. Finally, a significant difference in the lateral overhang of the coracoacromial complex was observed between the 3 groups. The NL group had a larger overhang than the CTA group, and the CTA group in turn had a larger overhang than the GHOA group.

      Level of evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Beuckelaers E.
        • Jacxsens M.
        • Van Tongel A.
        • De Wilde L.F.
        Three-dimensional computed tomography scan evaluation of the pattern of erosion in type B glenoids.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23: 109-116https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.04.009
        • Bigliani L.U.
        • Ticker J.B.
        • Flatow E.L.
        • Soslowsky L.J.
        • Mow V.C.
        The relationship of acromial architecture to rotator cuff disease.
        Clin Sports Med. 1991; 10: 823-838
        • Blonna D.
        • Giani A.
        • Bellato E.
        • Mattei L.
        • Calo M.
        • Rossi R.
        • et al.
        Predominance of the critical shoulder angle in the pathogenesis of degenerative diseases of the shoulder.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25: 1328-1336https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.059
        • Boileau P.
        • McClelland Jr., W.B.
        • Rumian A.P.
        Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: how to rebalance the cuff-deficient shoulder.
        Instr Course Lect. 2014; 63: 71-83
        • Casier S.J.
        • Van den Broecke R.
        • Van Houcke J.
        • Audenaert E.
        • De Wilde L.F.
        • Van Tongel A.
        Morphologic variations of the scapula in 3-dimensions: a statistical shape model approach.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27: 2224-2231https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.06.001
        • De Wilde L.F.
        • Verstraeten T.
        • Speeckaert W.
        • Karelse A.
        Reliability of the glenoid plane.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19: 414-422https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.005
        • Gerber C.
        • Catanzaro S.
        • Betz M.
        • Ernstbrunner L.
        Arthroscopic correction of the critical shoulder angle through lateral acromioplasty: a safe adjunct to rotator cuff repair.
        Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 771-780https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.255
        • Gerber C.
        • Snedeker J.G.
        • Baumgartner D.
        • Viehofer A.F.
        Supraspinatus tendon load during abduction is dependent on the size of the critical shoulder angle: a biomechanical analysis.
        J Orthop Res. 2014; 32: 952-957https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22621
        • Jacxsens M.
        • Van Tongel A.
        • Henninger H.B.
        • De Coninck B.
        • Mueller A.M.
        • De Wilde L.
        A three-dimensional comparative study on the scapulohumeral relationship in normal and osteoarthritic shoulders.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25: 1607-1615https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.035
        • Miswan M.F.
        • Saman M.S.
        • Hui T.S.
        • Al-Fayyadh M.Z.
        • Ali M.R.
        • Min N.W.
        Correlation between anatomy of the scapula and the incidence of rotator cuff tear and glenohumeral osteoarthritis via radiological study.
        J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017; 25 (2309499017690317)https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017690317
        • Moor B.K.
        • Bouaicha S.
        • Rothenfluh D.A.
        • Sukthankar A.
        • Gerber C.
        Is there an association between the individual anatomy of the scapula and the development of rotator cuff tears or osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint?: A radiological study of the critical shoulder angle.
        Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-b: 935-941https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.95b7.31028
        • Naidoo N.
        • Lazarus L.
        • Satyapal K.S.
        • De Wilde L.
        • Van Tongel A.
        The morphometric anatomy of the delto-fulcral triangle: a 3D CT-based reconstruction study.
        J Orthop. 2017; 14: 62-67https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2016.10.024
        • Nyffeler R.W.
        • Werner C.M.
        • Sukthankar A.
        • Schmid M.R.
        • Gerber C.
        Association of a large lateral extension of the acromion with rotator cuff tears.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 800-805https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.d.03042
        • Rockwood Jr., C.A.
        Rockwood Jr, C.A. Matsen III, F.A. Rockwood and Matsen's the shoulder. 5th ed. Elsevier, 2018
        • Smith G.C.S.
        • Liu V.
        • Lam P.H.
        The critical shoulder angle shows a reciprocal change in magnitude when evaluating symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears versus primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis as compared with control subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Arthroscopy. 2020; 36: 566-575https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.024
        • Suter T.
        • Gerber Popp A.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Zhang C.
        • Tashjian R.Z.
        • Henninger H.B.
        The influence of radiographic viewing perspective and demographics on the critical shoulder angle.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24: e149-e158https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.021
        • Viehofer A.F.
        • Snedeker J.G.
        • Baumgartner D.
        • Gerber C.
        Glenohumeral joint reaction forces increase with critical shoulder angles representative of osteoarthritis—a biomechanical analysis.
        J Orthop Res. 2016; 34: 1047-1052https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23122
      1. Wolf J. Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. The law of bone transformation. Springer, Berlin1892 ([in German])