Advertisement
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Wear and damage in retrieved humeral inlays of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty—where, how much, and why?

Published:November 18, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.015

      Background

      Polyethylene (PE) wear and material degradation have been reported as complications in reverse total shoulder replacements (rTSAs). In this regard, scapular notching is associated with more clinical complications. Therefore, the purposes of the study were to quantify the linear and volumetric wear, as a measure for the amount of removed material, and to qualitatively assess the PE damage modes to describe the material degradation in retrieved rTSA humeral PE inlays that contribute to failure of shoulder replacements. Furthermore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of scapular notching on PE wear and rim damage of the humeral components.

      Methods

      The total study population of 39 humeral inlays contains 2 cohorts that were used for the damage mode analysis and for the wear analysis, respectively. The extent and presence of wear damage modes in 5 defined zones were assessed by a grading system for all PE joint replacements. For quantitative wear analysis the most frequent design (n = 17) was chosen. Using a coordinate-measuring machine and postprocessing software, volumetric wear measurements for the retrieved humeral PE inlays were undertaken. Furthermore, prerevision radiographs were analyzed for scapular notching. Finally, retrieval findings were correlated with clinical and radiographic data to consider the effect of notching and to identify risk of failures for these prostheses.

      Results

      Damage on the rim of the humeral PE inlays was more frequent and severe than on the intended articulation surface. Irrespective of the damage mode, the inferior rim zone sustained the greatest amount of wear damage followed by the posterior zone. Burnishing, scratching, pitting, and embedded particles are most likely to occur in the articular surface area, whereas surface deformation, abrasion, delamination and gross material degradation are predominantly present in the inferior and posterior rim zones. The retrieved inlays exhibited a mean volumetric wear rate of 296.9 mm³/yr ± 87.0 mm³/yr. However, if the notched and non-notched components were compared, a significant higher volumetric wear rate (296.5 ± 106.1 mm³/yr) was found for the notched components compared to the non-notched group (65.7 ± 7.4 mm³/yr). Generally, there was a significantly greater incidence of damage and greater amount of wear if scapular notching occurred.

      Conclusion

      The notched components showed a 5-fold increase in PE wear rate. Therefore, scapular notching has a strong effect on PE damage and wear. If scapular notching can be clinically avoided, the PE wear performance is in a similar magnitude as found for hip and knee replacements.

      Level of evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Athanasou N.A.
        The pathobiology and pathology of aseptic implant failure.
        Bone Joint Res. 2016; 5: 162-168https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.55.BJR-2016-0086
        • Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry
        Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty Annual Report 2017.
        Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, Australia2017
        • Bansal A.
        • Khatib O.N.
        • Zuckerman J.D.
        Revision total joint arthroplasty: the epidemiology of 63,140 cases in New York State.
        J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29: 23-27https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.006
        • Brach del Prever E.M.
        • Bistolfi A.
        • Bracco P.
        • Costa L.
        UHMWPE for arthroplasty: past or future?.
        J Orthop Traumatol. 2009; 10: 1-8https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-008-0038-y
        • Carpenter S.
        • Pinkas D.
        • Newton M.D.
        • Kurdziel M.D.
        • Baker K.C.
        • Wiater J.M.
        Wear rates of retentive versus nonretentive reverse total shoulder arthroplasty liners in an in vitro wear simulation.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24: 1372-1379https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.02.016
        • Day J.S.
        • Lau E.
        • Ong K.L.
        • Williams G.R.
        • Ramsey M.L.
        • Kurtz S.M.
        Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19: 1115-1120https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.02.009
        • Day J.S.
        • MacDonald D.W.
        • Olsen M.
        • Getz C.
        • Williams G.R.
        • Kurtz S.M.
        Polyethylene wear in retrieved reverse total shoulder components.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21: 667-674https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.03.012
        • Devane P.A.
        • Robinson E.J.
        • Bourne R.B.
        • Rorabeck C.H.
        • Nayak N.N.
        • Horne J.G.
        Measurement of polyethylene wear in acetabular components inserted with and without cement. A randomized trial.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79: 682-689
        • Dumbleton J.H.
        • Manley M.T.
        • Edidin A.A.
        A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17: 649-661https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.33664
        • Elke R.
        • Rieker C.B.
        Estimating the osteolysis-free life of a total hip prosthesis depending on the linear wear rate and head size.
        Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2018; 232: 753-758https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411918784982
        • Frankle M.
        • Levy J.C.
        • Pupello D.
        • Siegal S.
        • Saleem A.
        • Mighell M.
        • et al.
        The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency: a minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients surgical technique.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 178-190https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00123
        • Gallo J.
        • Goodman S.B.
        • Konttinen Y.T.
        • Wimmer M.A.
        • Holinka M.
        Osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: a review of pathogenetic mechanisms.
        Acta Biomater. 2013; 9: 8046-8058https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.05.005
        • Griffiths M.W.
        • Athwal G.S.
        • Medley J.B.
        • Johnson J.A.
        • Langohr G.D.G.
        Wear of humeral polyethylene cups in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with simulated rim damage from scapular notching.
        Biotribology. 2020; 22: 100123https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2020.100123
        • Gunther S.B.
        • Graham J.
        • Norris T.R.
        • Ries M.D.
        • Pruitt L.
        Retrieved glenoid components: a classification system for surface damage analysis.
        J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17: 95-100https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.27671
        • Haider H.
        • Sperling J.
        • Throckmorton T.
        A method for wear testing of reverse shoulder arthroplasty systems.
        Orthop Proc. 2013; 95-B: 607
        • Han C.D.
        • Choe W.S.
        • Yoo J.H.
        Effect of polyethylene wear on osteolysis in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: minimal 5-year follow-up study.
        J Arthroplasty. 1999; 14: 714-723
        • Harman M.
        • Cristofolini L.
        • Erani P.
        • Stea S.
        • Viceconti M.
        A pictographic atlas for classifying damage modes on polyethylene bearings.
        J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011; 22: 1137-1146https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4303-x
        • Hertel R.
        • Ballmer F.T.
        Observations on retrieved glenoid components.
        J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18: 361-366https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2003.50048
        • Hood R.W.
        • Wright T.M.
        • Burstein A.H.
        Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses.
        J Biomed Mater Res. 1983; 17: 829-842
        • Katz J.N.
        Total joint replacement in osteoarthritis.
        Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006; 20: 145-153https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2005.09.003
        • Kohut G.
        • Dallmann F.
        • Irlenbusch U.
        Wear-induced loss of mass in reversed total shoulder arthroplasty with conventional and inverted bearing materials.
        J Biomech. 2012; 45: 469-473https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.11.055
        • Kurdziel M.D.
        • Newton M.D.
        • Hartner S.
        • Baker K.C.
        • Wiater J.M.
        Quantitative evaluation of retrieved reverse total shoulder arthroplasty liner surface deviation and volumetric wear.
        J Orthop Res. 2018; 36: 2007-2014https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23849
        • Langohr G.D.
        • Athwal G.S.
        • Johnson J.A.
        • Medley J.B.
        Wear simulation strategies for reverse shoulder arthroplasty implants.
        Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2016; 230: 458-469https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411916642801
        • Lewicki K.A.
        • Bell J.E.
        • Van Citters D.W.
        Analysis of polyethylene wear of reverse shoulder components: A validated technique and initial clinical results.
        J Orthop Res. 2017; 35: 980-987https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23353
        • Man K.
        • Jiang L.-H.
        • Foster R.
        • Yang X.B.
        Immunological responses to total hip arthroplasty.
        J Funct Biomater. 2017; 8: 33https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb8030033
        • Mueller U.
        • Braun S.
        • Schroeder S.
        • Schroeder M.
        • Sonntag R.
        • Jaeger S.
        • et al.
        Influence of humeral head material on wear performance in anatomic shoulder joint arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26: 1756-1764https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.008
        • Nam D.
        • Kepler C.K.
        • Nho S.J.
        • Craig E.V.
        • Warren R.F.
        • Wright T.M.
        Observations on retrieved humeral polyethylene components from reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19: 1003-1012https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.05.014
        • Oparaugo P.C.
        • Clarke I.C.
        • Malchau H.
        • Herberts P.
        Correlation of wear debris-induced osteolysis and revision with volumetric wear-rates of polyethylene: a survey of 8 reports in the literature.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 2001; 72: 22-28
        • Ormsby R.T.
        • Cantley M.
        • Kogawa M.
        • Solomon L.B.
        • Haynes D.R.
        • Findlay D.M.
        • et al.
        Evidence that osteocyte perilacunar remodelling contributes to polyethylene wear particle induced osteolysis.
        Acta Biomater. 2016; 33: 242-251https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.016
        • Peers S.
        • Moravek Jr., J.E.
        • Budge M.D.
        • Newton M.D.
        • Kurdziel M.D.
        • Baker K.C.
        • et al.
        Wear rates of highly cross-linked polyethylene humeral liners subjected to alternating cycles of glenohumeral flexion and abduction.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24: 143-149https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.001
        • Quental C.
        • Folgado J.
        • Fernandes P.R.
        • Monteiro J.
        Computational analysis of polyethylene wear in anatomical and reverse shoulder prostheses.
        Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015; 53: 111-122https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-014-1221-3
        • Smith S.L.
        • Li B.L.
        • Buniya A.
        • Lin S.H.
        • Scholes S.C.
        • Johnson G.
        • et al.
        In vitro wear testing of a contemporary design of reverse shoulder prosthesis.
        J Biomech. 2015; 48: 3072-3079https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.07.022
        • Sirveaux F.
        • Favard L.
        • Oudet D.
        • Huquet D.
        • Walch G.
        • Mole D.
        Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86: 388-395https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14024
        • Terrier A.
        • Merlini F.
        • Pioletti D.P.
        • Farron A.
        Comparison of polyethylene wear in anatomical and reversed shoulder prostheses.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91: 977-982https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.21999
        • Terrier A.
        • Reist A.
        • Vogel A.
        • Farron A.
        Effect of supraspinatus deficiency on humerus translation and glenohumeral contact force during abduction.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007; 22: 645-651https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.01.015
        • Terrier A.
        • Vogel A.
        • Capezzali M.
        • Farron A.
        An algorithm to allow humerus translation in the indeterminate problem of shoulder abduction.
        Med Eng Phys. 2008; 30: 710-716https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.07.011
        • Van de Kleut M.L.
        • Athwal G.S.
        • Faber K.J.
        • Teeter M.G.
        In vivo volumetric and linear wear measurement of reverse shoulder arthroplasty at minimum 5-year follow-up.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29: 1695-1702https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.11.031
        • Vaupel Z.M.
        • Baker K.C.
        • Kurdziel M.D.
        • Wiater J.M.
        Wear simulation of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty systems: effect of glenosphere design.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21: 1422-1429https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.024
        • Wiater B.P.
        • Baker E.A.
        • Salisbury M.R.
        • Koueiter D.M.
        • Baker K.C.
        • Nolan B.M.
        • et al.
        Elucidating trends in revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty procedures: a retrieval study evaluating clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes data.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24: 1915-1925https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.004
        • Willis M.
        • Min W.
        • Brooks J.P.
        • Mulieri P.
        • Walker M.
        • Pupello D.
        • et al.
        Proximal humeral malunion treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21: 507-513https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.042