Advertisement
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

The critical shoulder angle does not change over time: a radiographic study

Published:November 04, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.042

      Background

      The anatomy of the scapula may predispose individuals to develop shoulder pathologies. The purpose of this study was to determine if the scapular anatomy, in particular the critical shoulder angle (CSA), changes over a long-term follow-up, or if it is a stable parameter. We hypothesized that increasing age would not influence the scapular morphology.

      Methods

      We analyzed shoulder radiographs in our database from 2002 to 2019 to extract radiographs at an interval of at least 10 years. Radiographic analysis included measuring the CSA and assessing the acromion type according to Bigliani and Morrison, the posterior acromial height and the posterior acromial tilt.

      Results

      A total of 41 patients (47 shoulders) with a mean age of 53 years (range, 15-76; standard deviation [SD], ±14) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean interval between the 2 sets of radiographs was 12 years (range, 10-16; SD ±2).The mean CSA did not change significantly with 34° (range, 20-41; SD ±4) at the first and 34° (range, 19-44; SD ±5) (P = .597) at the second assessment. On the initial lateral radiographs (“Neer view”), there were 11 type 1 (24%), 32 type 2 (70%), and 3 type 3 (6%) acromia according to Bigliani and Morrison. At the second assessment, there were 16 type 1 (34%), 28 type 2 (60%), and 3 type 3 (7%). Between both sets of radiographs, 11 were different (23%), without a trend in the type of change being discernible. The posterior acromial height was stable with 19 mm (range, 2-36; SD ±8) at the first and 18 mm (range, 5-38; SD ±8) at the second assessment (P = .186). The posterior acromion tilt changed from 59° (range, 34-81; SD ±10) to 62° (range, 30-81; SD ±10) (P < .001). Among 6 cases with rotator cuff tears (RCTs) already at the first assessment, the CSA did not change significantly at 10 years' follow-up (P = .414). Among the 10 cases with new RCTs at the second assessment, the CSA did not change significantly at 10 years' follow-up from 34° (range, 25-41; SD ±5) to 35° (range, 24-44; SD ±6) (P = .510). In the group of 31 shoulders without RCT, the mean CSA at the first assessment of 34° (range, 28-41; SD ±3) stayed also stable with 34° (range, 28-40; SD ±3) (P = .796).

      Conclusion

      The CSA is an anatomical parameter of the scapula that does not change in size after closure of the physes.

      Level of evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Armstrong J.R.
        Excision of the acromion in treatment of the supraspinatus syndrome; report of 95 excisions.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1949; 31B: 436-442
        • Balke M.
        • Liem D.
        • Greshake O.
        • Hoeher J.
        • Bouillon B.
        • Banerjee M.
        Differences in acromial morphology of shoulders in patients with degenerative and traumatic supraspinatus tendon tears.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24: 2200-2205https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3499-y
        • Bigliani L.U.
        • Morrison D.S.
        • April E.W.
        The morphology of the acromion and its relationship to rotator cuff tears. The morphology of the acromion and its relationship to rotator cuff tears.
        Orthop Trans. 1986; 10: 216
        • Chalmers P.N.
        • Salazar D.
        • Steger-May K.
        • Chamberlain A.M.
        • Yamaguchi K.
        • Keener J.D.
        Does the critical shoulder angle correlate with rotator cuff tear progression?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017; 475: 1608-1617https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5249-1
        • Hamada K.
        • Fukuda H.
        • Mikasa M.
        • Kobayashi Y.
        Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; 254: 92-96
        • Hyvönen P.
        • Lohi S.
        • Jalovaara P.
        Open acromioplasty does not prevent the progression of an impingement syndrome to a tear. Nine-year follow-up of 96 cases.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80: 813-816
        • Kitay G.S.
        • Iannotti J.P.
        • Williams G.R.
        • Haygood T.
        • Kneeland B.J.
        • Berlin J.
        Roentgenographic assessment of acromial morphologic condition in rotator cuff impingement syndrome.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995; 4: 441-448
        • Liotard J.P.
        • Cochard P.
        • Walch G.
        Critical analysis of the supraspinatus outlet view: rationale for a standard scapular Y-view.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998; 7: 134-139
        • Meyer D.C.
        • Ernstbrunner L.
        • Boyce G.
        • Imam M.A.
        • El Nashar R.
        • Gerber C.
        Posterior acromial morphology is significantly associated with posterior shoulder instability.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019; 101: 1253-1260https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.00541
        • Moor B.K.
        • Bouaicha S.
        • Rothenfluh D.A.
        • Sukthankar A.
        • Gerber C.
        Is there an association between the individual anatomy of the scapula and the development of rotator cuff tears or osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint?: a radiological study of the critical shoulder angle.
        Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B: 935-941https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.31028
        • Moor B.K.
        • Wieser K.
        • Slankamenac K.
        • Gerber C.
        • Bouaicha S.
        Relationship of individual scapular anatomy and degenerative rotator cuff tears.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23: 536-541https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.008
        • Neer 2nd, C.S.
        Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972; 54: 41-50
        • Nicholson G.P.
        • Goodman D.A.
        • Flatow E.L.
        • Bigliani L.U.
        The acromion: morphologic condition and age-related changes. A study of 420 scapulas.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996; 5: 1-11
        • Nyffeler R.W.
        • Werner C.M.
        • Sukthankar A.
        • Schmid M.R.
        • Gerber C.
        Association of a large lateral extension of the acromion with rotator cuff tears.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 800-805https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.03042
        • Ozaki J.
        • Fujimoto S.
        • Nakagawa Y.
        • Masuhara K.
        • Tamai S.
        Tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder associated with pathological changes in the acromion. A study in cadavera.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988; 70: 1224-1230
        • Samilson R.L.
        • Prieto V.
        Dislocation arthropathy of the shoulder.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65: 456-460
        • Shah N.N.
        • Bayliss N.C.
        • Malcolm A.
        Shape of the acromion: congenital or acquired—a macroscopic, radiographic, and microscopic study of acromion.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001; 10: 309-316
        • Suter T.
        • Gerber Popp A.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Zhang C.
        • Tashjian R.Z.
        • Henninger H.B.
        The influence of radiographic viewing perspective and demographics on the critical shoulder angle.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24: e149-e158https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.021
        • Tetreault P.
        • Krueger A.
        • Zurakowski D.
        • Gerber C.
        Glenoid version and rotator cuff tears.
        J Orthop Res. 2004; 22: 202-207https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00116-5
        • Tuite M.J.
        • Toivonen D.A.
        • Orwin J.F.
        • Wright D.H.
        Acromial angle on radiographs of the shoulder: correlation with the impingement syndrome and rotator cuff tears.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995; 165: 609-613
        • Vahakari M.
        • Leppilahti J.
        • Hyvonen P.
        • Ristiniemi J.
        • Paivansalo M.
        • Jalovaara P.
        Acromial shape in asymptomatic subjects: a study of 305 shoulders in different age groups.
        Acta Radiol. 2010; 51: 202-206https://doi.org/10.3109/02841850903476556
        • Viehöfer A.F.
        • Gerber C.
        • Favre P.
        • Bachmann E.
        • Snedeker J.G.
        A larger critical shoulder angle requires more rotator cuff activity to preserve joint stability.
        J Orthop Res. 2016; 34: 961-968https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23104
        • Viehöfer A.F.
        • Snedeker J.G.
        • Baumgartner D.
        • Gerber C.
        Glenohumeral joint reaction forces increase with critical shoulder angles representative of osteoarthritis—a biomechanical analysis.
        J Orthop Res. 2016; 34: 1047-1052https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23122
        • Wang J.C.
        • Shapiro M.S.
        Changes in acromial morphology with age.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997; 6: 55-59