Advertisement
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Long-term results after arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair

Published:December 17, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.09.003

      Background

      The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiologic results after arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair (TORCR).

      Methods

      A total of 69 patients with full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears with or without infraspinatus tendon tears treated with arthroscopic TORCR by a single surgeon between 1998 and 2003 were included. Among them, 56 patients (81%) with a mean age of 58 ± 5 years (range, 42-70 years) were available for final follow-up examination after an average of 15 ± 2 years (range, 12-18 years). The Subjective Shoulder Value, Constant score (CS), University of California at Los Angeles score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score were recorded. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to visualize tendon integrity in 66% of patients.

      Results

      At final follow-up, the mean CS was 84 ± 8 points; mean University of California at Los Angeles score, 33 ± 2 points; mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 92 ± 10 points; and mean Subjective Shoulder Value, 89% ± 17%. MRI revealed asymptomatic repair failure in 9 patients (27%). Moreover, 4 patients (7%) underwent revision surgery because of a symptomatic rerupture, resulting in an overall retear rate of 33%. Patients with intact repairs at final follow-up showed a significantly higher CS (P = .019) and abduction strength (P = .016) than patients with retears.

      Conclusion

      Arthroscopic TORCR for the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears provided good clinical results 12 to 18 years after surgery. Cuff integrity on follow-up MRI scans had a positive effect on the clinical outcome.

      Level of evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Adla D.N.
        • Rowsell M.
        • Pandey R.
        Cost-effectiveness of open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19: 258-261
        • Amstutz H.C.
        • Sew Hoy A.L.
        • Clarke I.C.
        UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981; 155: 7-20
        • Bayne O.
        • Bateman J.E.
        Long-term results of surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears.
        in: Bateman J.E. Welsch R.P. Surgery of the shoulder. CV Mosby, Philadelphia1984: 167-171
        • Bennett W.F.
        Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness supraspinatus tears (small-to-medium): a prospective study with 2- to 4-year follow-up.
        Arthroscopy. 2003; 19: 249-256
        • Black E.M.
        • Austin L.S.
        • Narzikul A.
        • Seidl A.J.
        • Martens K.
        • Lazarus M.D.
        Comparison of implant cost and surgical time in arthroscopic transosseous and transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25: 1449-1456
        • Boileau P.
        • Brassart N.
        • Watkinson D.J.
        • Carles M.
        • Hatzidakis A.M.
        • Krishnan S.G.
        Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal?.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 1229-1240
        • Churchill R.S.
        • Ghorai J.K.
        Total cost and operating room time comparison of rotator cuff repair techniques at low, intermediate, and high volume centers: mini-open versus all-arthroscopic.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19: 716-721
        • Cicak N.
        • Klobucar H.
        • Bicanic G.
        • Trsek D.
        Arthroscopic transosseous suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repairs.
        Arthroscopy. 2006; 22 (565.e1-6)
        • Cofield R.H.
        • Parvizi J.
        • Hoffmeyer P.J.
        • Lanzer W.L.
        • Ilstrup D.M.
        • Rowland C.M.
        Surgical repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. A prospective long-term study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83: 71-77
        • Cole B.J.
        • McCarty III, L.P.
        • Kang R.W.
        • Alford W.
        • Lewis P.B.
        • Hayden J.K.
        Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective functional outcome and repair integrity at minimum 2-year follow-up.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16: 579-585
        • Collin P.
        • Kempf J.F.
        • Molé D.
        • Meyer N.
        • Agout C.
        • Saffarini M.
        • et al.
        Ten-year multicenter clinical and MRI evaluation of isolated supraspinatus repairs.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99: 1355-1364
        • Constant C.R.
        • Murley A.H.
        A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; 214: 160-164
        • Diebold G.
        • Lam P.
        • Walton J.
        • Murrell G.A.C.
        Relationship between age and rotator cuff retear: a study of 1,600 consecutive rotator cuff repairs.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99: 1198-1205
        • Elia F.
        • Azoulay V.
        • Lebon J.
        • Faraud A.
        • Bonnevialle N.
        • Mansat P.
        Clinical and anatomic results of surgical repair of chronic rotator cuff tears at ten-year minimum follow-up.
        Int Orthop. 2017; 41: 1219-1226
        • Garofalo R.
        • Castagna A.
        • Borroni M.
        • Krishnan S.G.
        Arthroscopic transosseous (anchorless) rotator cuff repair.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy. 2012; 20: 1031-1035
        • Gilbart M.K.
        • Gerber C.
        Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16: 717-721
        • Hein J.
        • Reilly J.M.
        • Chae J.
        • Maerz T.
        • Anderson K.
        Retear rates after arthroscopic single-row, double-row, and suture bridge rotator cuff repair at a minimum of 1 year of imaging follow-up: a systematic review.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 2274-2281
        • Heuberer P.R.
        • Smolen D.
        • Pauzenberger L.
        • Plachel F.
        • Salem S.
        • Laky B.
        • et al.
        Longitudinal long-term magnetic resonance imaging and clinical follow-up after single-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: clinical superiority of structural tendon integrity.
        Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 1283-1288
        • Kluger R.
        • Bock P.
        • Mittlbock M.
        • Krampla W.
        • Engel A.
        Long-term survivorship of rotator cuff repairs using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging analysis.
        Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 2071-2081
        • Kukkonen J.
        • Kauko T.
        • Vahlberg T.
        • Joukainen A.
        • Aarimaa V.
        Investigating minimal clinically important difference for Constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22: 1650-1655
        • Kuroda S.
        • Ishige N.
        • Mikasa M.
        Advantages of arthroscopic transosseous suture repair of the rotator cuff without the use of anchors.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471: 3514-3522
        • Matis N.
        • Hübner C.
        • Aschauer E.
        • Resch H.
        Arthroscopic transosseous reinsertion of the rotator cuff.
        Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2006; 18: 1-18
        • Michener L.A.
        • McClure P.W.
        • Sennett B.J.
        American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11: 587-594
        • Paxton E.S.
        • Teefey S.A.
        • Dahiya N.
        • Keener J.D.
        • Yamaguchi K.
        • Galatz L.M.
        Clinical and radiographic outcomes of failed repairs of large or massive rotator cuff tears: minimum ten-year follow-up.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 627-632
        • Randelli P.
        • Stoppani C.A.
        • Zaolino C.
        • Menon A.
        • Randelli F.
        • Cabitza P.
        Advantages of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a transosseous suture technique: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 2000-2009
        • Sugaya H.
        • Maeda K.
        • Matsuki K.
        • Moriishi J.
        Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation.
        Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 1307-1316
        • Tashjian R.Z.
        • Hung M.
        • Keener J.D.
        • Bowen R.C.
        • McAllister J.
        • Chen W.
        • et al.
        Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain after shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26: 144-148
        • Tempelhof S.
        • Rupp S.
        • Seil R.
        Age-related prevalence of rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic shoulders.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8: 296-299
        • Urita A.
        • Funakoshi T.
        • Horie T.
        • Nishida M.
        • Iwasaki N.
        Difference in vascular patterns between transosseous-equivalent and transosseous rotator cuff repair.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26: 149-156
        • Vastamäki M.
        • Lohman M.
        • Borgmastars N.
        Rotator cuff integrity correlates with clinical and functional results at a minimum 16 years after open repair.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471: 554-561
        • Zhang A.L.
        • Montgomery S.R.
        • Ngo S.S.
        • Hame S.L.
        • Wang J.C.
        • Gamradt S.C.
        Analysis of rotator cuff repair trends in a large private insurance population.
        Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 623-629