Advertisement
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Proximal humerus fragility fractures: recent trends in nonoperative and operative treatment in the Medicare population

Published:October 02, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.07.015

      Background

      With an aging population, fragility fractures including injuries to the proximal humerus continue to rise in the United States. The purpose of this study was to investigate recent trends in the incidence and treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) in a cross-sectional elderly population.

      Methods

      Medicare data from 2005 to 2012 were queried to identify patients treated for PHF. Associated patient demographics, hospitalization data, treatment, and revision status were obtained. Statistical analyses were performed to identify significant trends in treatment.

      Results

      There were 259,506 PHFs recorded, with 79% occurring in female patients. In all age groups, nonoperative treatment of PHF was the most common method (67%). Within the surgical group, open reduction with internal fixation was most frequently used, and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) was the least common (11%). However, although the overall rate of surgical intervention remained constant, there was a significant increase in treatment with TSA from 3% in 2005 to 17% in 2012. In particular, RTSA represented 89% of all TSAs for PHF in 2011. All surgical treatment options demonstrated high 2-year survival rates without revision surgery (97%).

      Conclusion

      Recent trends show that in the elderly population, nonoperative management remains the most common treatment for PHFs. Within the surgically treated cohort, there has been an increase in treatment with arthroplasty including RTSA, with a low rate of early revisions. There are excellent survival rates in all surgically treated PHFs, but long-term data will be required to fully evaluate the viability of these surgical options.

      Level of evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Baron J.A.
        • Karagas M.
        • Barrett J.
        • Kniffin W.
        • Malenka D.
        • Mayor M.
        • et al.
        Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limb among Americans over 65 years of age.
        Epidemiology. 1996; 7: 612-618
        • Bogoch E.R.
        • Elliot-Gibson V.
        • Beaton D.E.
        • Jamal S.A.
        • Josse R.G.
        • Murray T.M.
        Effective initiation of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment for patients with a fragility fracture in an orthopaedic environment.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 25-34https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00198
        • Bufquin T.
        • Hersan A.
        • Hubert L.
        • Massin P.
        Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89: 516-520https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.18435
        • Clavert P.
        • Adam P.
        • Bevort A.
        • Bonnomet F.
        • Kempf J.F.
        Pitfalls and complications with locking plate for proximal humerus fracture.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19: 489-494https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.09.005
        • Cosman F.
        • de Beur S.J.
        • LeBoff M.S.
        • Lewiecki E.M.
        • Tanner B.
        • Randall S.
        • et al.
        Clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.
        Osteoporos Int. 2014; 25: 2359-2381https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2
        • Cuff D.J.
        • Pupello D.R.
        Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 2050-2055https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01637
        • Egol K.A.
        • Ong C.C.
        • Walsh M.
        • Jazrawi L.M.
        • Tejwani N.C.
        • Zuckerman J.D.
        Early complications in proximal humerus fracture (OTA types 11) treated with locked plates.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 22: 159-164https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318169ef2a
        • Eisman J.A.
        • Bogoch E.R.
        • Dell R.
        • Harrington J.T.
        • McKinney Jr., R.E.
        • McLellan A.
        • et al.
        Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention.
        J Bone Miner Res. 2012; 27: 2039-2046https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1698
        • Fjalestad T.
        • Hole M.Ø.
        • Hovden I.A.
        • Blücher J.
        • Strømsøe K.
        Surgical treatment with an angular stable plate for complex displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2012; 26: 98-106https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821c2e15
        • Green A.
        • Norris T.R.
        Part II: proximal humeral fractures and fracture-dislocations.
        in: Browner B.D. Jupiter J.B. Levine A.M. Trafton P.G. Krettek C. Skeletal trauma: basic science, management, and reconstruction. ed 4. 978-1-4160-2220-6 Saunders, Philadelphia2009: 1643-1716
        • Hondoll H.H.
        • Ollivere B.J.
        • Rollins K.E.
        Interventions for treating proximal humerus fractures in adults.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 12: CD000434https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub3
        • Iyengar J.J.
        • Devcic Z.
        • Sproul R.C.
        • Feeley B.T.
        Nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2011; 25: 612-617https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182008df8
        • Jobin C.M.
        • Galdi B.
        • Anakwenze O.A.
        • Ahmad C.S.
        • Levine W.N.
        Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the management of proximal humerus fractures.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015; 23: 190-201https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-13-00190
        • Kannus P.
        • Palvanen M.
        • Niemi S.
        • Parkkari J.
        • Järvinen M.
        • Vuori I.
        Increasing number and incidence of osteoporotic fracture of the proximal humerus in elderly people.
        BMJ. 1996; 313: 1051-1052
        • Kim S.H.
        • Wise B.L.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Szabo R.M.
        Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93: 2249-2254https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01994
        • Lanting B.
        • MacDermid J.
        • Drosdowech D.
        • Faber K.J.
        Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17: 42-52https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.016
        • Lee S.H.
        • Dargent-Molina P.
        • Bréart G.
        • EPIDOS Group
        Risk factors for fractures of the proximal humerus: results from the EPIDOS prospective study.
        J Bone Miner Res. 2002; 17: 817-825https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.5.817
        • McLellan A.R.
        • Gallacher S.J.
        • Fraser M.
        • McQuillian C.
        The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture.
        Osteoporos Int. 2003; 14: 1028-1034https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1507-z
        • Neer C.S.
        Displaced proximal humeral fractures: I. Classification and evaluation.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970; 52: 1077-1089
        • Neer C.S.
        Displaced proximal humeral fractures: II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970; 52: 1090-1103
        • Nguyen T.V.
        • Center J.R.
        • Sambroo P.N.
        • Eisman J.A.
        Risk factors for proximal humerus, forearm, and wrist fractures in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 153: 587-595
        • Rangan A.
        • Handoll H.
        • Brealey S.
        • Jefferson L.
        • Keding A.
        • Martin B.C.
        • et al.
        Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: the PROFHER randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA. 2015; 313: 1037-1047https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.1629
        • Schairer W.W.
        • Nwachukwu B.U.
        • Lyman S.
        • Craig E.V.
        • Gulotta L.V.
        National utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24: 91-97https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.026
        • Sebastiá-Forcada E.
        • Cebrián-Gómez R.
        • Lizaur-Utrilla A.
        • Gil-Guillén V.
        Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23: 1419-1426https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.035
        • Singh A.
        • Adams A.L.
        • Burchette R.
        • Dell R.M.
        • Funahashi T.T.
        • Navarro R.
        The effect of osteoporosis management on proximal humeral fracture.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24: 191-198https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.07.005
        • Sturzenegger M.
        • Fornaro E.
        • Jakob R.P.
        Results of surgical treatment of multifragmented fractures of the humeral head.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1982; 100: 249-259
        • Südkamp N.
        • Bayer J.
        • Hepp P.
        • Voigt C.
        • Oestern H.
        • Kääb M.
        • et al.
        Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91: 1320-1328https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00006