Advertisement
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: Reliability, validity, and responsiveness

      Abstract

      The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), patient self-report section. Patients with shoulder dysfunction (n = 63) completed the ASES, The University of Pennsylvania Shoulder Score, and the Short Form–36 during the initial evaluation, 24 to 72 hours after the initial visit, and after 3 to 4 weeks of physical therapy. The test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient[1-way random-effects], 0.84; 95% CI lower limit, 0.75) and internal consistency (Cronbach α, 0.86) values were acceptable. The standard error of the measure was 6.7 ASES points (90% CI, 11.0). Construct and discriminant validity was demonstrated. Responsiveness was demonstrated with a standardized response mean of 1.5 and an effect size of 1.4. The minimal detectable change was 9.7 ASES points (90% CI, 16), and the minimal clinically important difference was 6.4 ASES points. The results indicate that the ASES is a reliable, valid, and responsive outcome tool. (J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11:587-94)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Beaton D
        • Richards RR
        Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998; 7: 565-572
        • Beaton DE
        Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 3192-3199
        • Beaton DE
        • Richards RR
        Measuring function of the shoulder. A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78: 882-890
        • Deyo RA
        • Centor RM
        Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.
        J Chronic Dis. 1986; 39: 897-906
        • Fritz JM
        • Irrgang JJ
        A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.
        Phys Ther. 2001; 81: 776-788
        • Guyatt GH
        • Feeny DH
        • Patrick DL
        Measuring health-related quality of life.
        Ann Intern Med. 1993; 118: 622-629
        • Guyatt GH
        • Kirshner B
        • Jaeschke R
        Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties?.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45: 1341-1345
        • Guyatt GH
        • Walter S
        • Norman G
        Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.
        J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40: 171-178
        • Heald SL
        • Riddle DL
        • Lamb RL
        The shoulder pain and disability index: the construct validity and responsiveness of a region-specific disability measure.
        Phys Ther. 1997; 77: 1079-1089
        • Jaeschke R
        • Singer J
        • Guyatt GH
        Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.
        Control Clin Trials. 1989; 10: 407-415
        • Kantz ME
        • Harris WJ
        • Levitsky K
        • Ware Jr, JE
        • Davies AR
        Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement.
        Med Care. 1992; 30: MS240-MS252
        • Kazis LE
        • Anderson JJ
        • Meenan RF
        Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status.
        Med Care. 1989; 27: S178-S189
        • L'Insalata JC
        • Warren RF
        • Cohen SB
        • Altchek DW
        • Peterson MG
        A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79: 738-748
        • Leggin BG
        • Neuman RM
        • Shaffer MA
        • Iannotti JP
        • Williams GR
        • Brenneman SK
        Reliability and validity of a shoulder outcome scoring system [abstract].
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996; 23: 65
        • Liang MH
        • Fossel AH
        • Larson MG
        Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation.
        Med Care. 1990; 28: 632-642
        • McGraw KO
        • Wong SP
        Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients.
        Psychological Methods. 1996; 1: 30-46
        • McHorney CA
        • Ware Jr, JE
        • Rogers W
        • Raczek AE
        • Lu JF
        The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts.
        Med Care. 1992; 30: MS253-MS265
        • Norman GR
        • Stratford P
        • Regehr G
        Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50: 869-879
        • Nunnally JC
        • Bernstein IH
        Psychometric theory.
        in: McGraw-Hill, Inc, New York1994: 83-101 (251-92)
        • Portney LG
        • Watkins MP
        Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice.
        in: 2nd ed. Prentice Hall Health, Upper Saddle River (NJ)2000: 565 (705-11)
      1. Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG, et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg:347-52.

        • Roach KE
        • Budiman-Mak E
        • Songsiridej N
        • Lertratanakul Y
        Development of a shoulder pain and disability index.
        Arthritis Care Res. 1991; 4: 143-149
        • Stucki G
        • Liang MH
        • Fossel AH
        • Katz JN
        Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1995; 48: 1369-1378
        • Ware Jr, JE
        • Sherbourne CD
        The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.
        Med Care. 1992; 30: 473-483
        • Williams Jr, JW
        • Holleman Jr, DR
        • Simel DL
        Measuring shoulder function with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index.
        J Rheumatol. 1995; 22: 727-732
        • Cohen J
        Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
        Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ1983