Advertisement
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Failure of the lesser tuberosity osteotomy after total shoulder arthroplasty

Published:August 05, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.006

      Background

      Lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) as an approach during total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a reliable technique with strong biomechanical fixation and a low failure rate. Complications have been infrequently reported in the literature.

      Methods

      We report a case series of 5 patients who sustained failure of the LTO repair after primary TSA. The data on the patient demographic characteristics, surgical technique, postoperative care, revision surgery, and clinical outcomes are reported.

      Results

      The mean age of the 5 patients was 52 years, all patients were men, and the mean body mass index was 28 kg/m2. They were followed up for a mean of 29 months (range, 24-38 months). The mean time from initial TSA to diagnosis of LTO failure was 9 weeks (range, 5-12 weeks). Two patients reported no trauma, 2 had minor trauma (using a pulley, rolling over in bed), and 1 sustained a fall. At the latest follow-up, the mean visual analog scale; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation; University of California, Los Angeles; and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were 4 (range, 0-6), 48 (range, 20-70), 19 (range, 11-22), and 63 (range, 48-83), respectively. Only 1 patient required no additional procedures beyond the revision LTO repair. Another patient required a second revision LTO repair. The remaining 3 patients either underwent or were recommended to undergo reverse arthroplasty.

      Conclusion

      Failure of the LTO repair after TSA may possibly be an under-reported complication that is associated with poor clinical outcomes and limited options for revision surgery. In patients with a high risk of LTO failure, considerations should be made to augment the LTO repair during the index TSA procedure.

      Level of evidence

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Caplan J.L.
        • Whitfield B.
        • Neviaser R.J.
        Subscapularis function after primary tendon to tendon repair in patients after replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18 (discussion 7-8): 193-196https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.10.019
        • Edwards T.B.
        • Boulahia A.
        • Kempf J.F.
        • Boileau P.
        • Nemoz C.
        • Walch G.
        The influence of rotator cuff disease on the results of shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84: 2240-2248
        • Gerber C.
        • Pennington S.D.
        • Yian E.H.
        • Pfirrmann C.A.
        • Werner C.M.
        • Zumstein M.A.
        Lesser tuberosity osteotomy for total shoulder arthroplasty. Surgical technique.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 170-177https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00407
        • Gerber C.
        • Yian E.H.
        • Pfirrmann C.A.W.
        • Zumstein M.A.
        • Werner C.M.L.
        Subscapularis muscle function and structure after total shoulder replacement with lesser tuberosity osteotomy and repair.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 1739-1745https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02788
        • Giuseffi S.A.
        • Wongtriratanachai P.
        • Omae H.
        • Cil A.
        • Zobitz M.E.
        • An K.N.
        • et al.
        Biomechanical comparison of lesser tuberosity osteotomy versus subscapularis tenotomy in total shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21: 1087-1095https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.008
        • Habermeyer P.
        • Magosch P.
        • Lichtenberg S.
        Recentering the humeral head for glenoid deficiency in total shoulder arthroplasty.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 457: 124-132https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802ff03c
        • Heckman D.S.
        • Hoover S.A.
        • Weinhold P.S.
        • Spang J.T.
        • Creighton R.A.
        Repair of lesser tuberosity osteotomy for shoulder arthroplasty: biomechanical evaluation of the backpack and dual row techniques.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20: 491-496https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.004
        • Jandhyala S.
        • Unnithan A.
        • Hughes S.
        • Hong T.
        Subscapularis tenotomy versus lesser tuberosity osteotomy during total shoulder replacement: a comparison of patient outcomes.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20: 1102-1107https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.03.019
        • Krishnan S.G.
        • Stewart D.G.
        • Reineck J.R.
        • Lin K.C.
        • Buzzell J.E.
        • Burkhead W.Z.
        Subscapularis repair after shoulder arthroplasty: biomechanical and clinical validation of a novel technique.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18: 184-192https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.09.009
        • Lapner P.L.C.
        • Sabri E.
        • Rakhra K.
        • Bell K.
        • Athwal G.S.
        Healing rates and subscapularis fatty infiltration after lesser tuberosity osteotomy versus subscapularis peel for exposure during shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22: 396-402https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.05.031
        • Lapner P.L.C.
        • Sabri E.
        • Rakhra K.
        • Bell K.
        • Athwal G.S.
        Comparison of lesser tuberosity osteotomy to subscapularis peel in shoulder arthroplasty a randomized controlled trial.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: 2239-2246https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01365
        • Levy J.C.
        • Kalandiak S.
        Radiographic appearance of displaced lesser tuberosity osteotomy: a case series.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20: 395-400https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.015
        • Miller B.S.
        • Joseph T.A.
        • Noonan T.J.
        • Horan M.P.
        • Hawkins R.J.
        Rupture of the subscapularis tendon after shoulder arthroplasty: diagnosis, treatment, and outcome.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14: 492-496https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.02.013
        • Miller S.L.
        • Hazrati Y.
        • Klepps S.
        • Chiang A.
        • Flatow E.L.
        Loss of subscapularis function after total shoulder replacement: a seldom recognized problem.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003; 12: 29-34https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2003.128195
        • Moeckel B.H.
        • Altchek D.W.
        • Warren R.F.
        • Wickiewicz T.L.
        • Dines D.M.
        Instability of the shoulder after arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75: 492-497
        • Ponce B.A.
        • Ahluwalia R.S.
        • Mazzocca A.D.
        • Gobezie R.G.
        • Warner J.J.
        • Millett P.J.
        Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of a novel lesser tuberosity repair technique in total shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 1-8https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00441
        • Qureshi S.
        • Hsiao A.
        • Klug R.A.
        • Lee E.
        • Braman J.
        • Flatow E.L.
        Subscapularis function after total shoulder replacement: results with lesser tuberosity osteotomy.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17: 68-72https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.018
        • Rowe C.R.
        • Patel D.
        • Southmayd W.W.
        The Bankart procedure: a long-term end-result study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978; 60: 1-16
        • Scalise J.J.
        • Ciccone J.
        • Iannotti J.P.
        Clinical, radiographic, and ultrasonographic comparison of subscapularis tenotomy and lesser tuberosity osteotomy for total shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 1627-1634https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01461
        • Schmidt C.C.
        • Jarrett C.D.
        • Brown B.T.
        • Degravelle Jr., M.
        • Sawardeker P.
        • Weir D.M.
        • et al.
        Effect of lesser tuberosity osteotomy size and repair construct during total shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23: 117-127https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.03.018
        • Van den Berghe G.R.
        • Nguyen B.
        • Patil S.
        • D’Lima D.D.
        • Mahar A.
        • Pedowitz R.
        • et al.
        A biomechanical evaluation of three surgical techniques for subscapularis repair.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17: 156-161https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.016
        • Van Thiel G.S.
        • Wang V.M.
        • Wang F.C.
        • Nho S.J.
        • Piasecki D.P.
        • Bach Jr., B.R.
        • et al.
        Biomechanical similarities among subscapularis repairs after shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19: 657-663https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.01.014