Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 7 , Pages 1034-1039, October 2010

Does slower rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair lead to long-term stiffness?

  • Bradford O. Parsons, MD

      Affiliations

    • Leni & Peter May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Bradford O. Parsons, MD, Leni & Peter May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 5 E 98th St, Box 1188, New York, NY 10029.
  • ,
  • Konrad I. Gruson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
  • ,
  • Darwin D. Chen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Leni & Peter May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Alicia K. Harrison, MD

      Affiliations

    • Leni & Peter May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • James Gladstone, MD

      Affiliations

    • Leni & Peter May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Evan L. Flatow, MD

      Affiliations

    • Leni & Peter May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY

published online 26 July 2010.

Hypothesis

Conservative rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair does not result in long-term stiffness and improves rates of tendon healing.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively evaluated 43 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears who underwent a standardized, conservative protocol of full-time sling immobilization without formal therapy for 6 weeks after arthroscopic repair. At 6 to 8 weeks of follow-up, we categorized patients as “stiff” if they demonstrated forward elevation of less than 100° and external rotation of less than 30° passively; all others were designated “nonstiff.” Active range of motion in forward elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation was assessed at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant-Murley scores were assessed at 1 year. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained in all patients to assess tendon healing.

Results

Ten patients (23%) were considered stiff after rotator cuff surgery. At 1 year, there was no difference in mean forward elevation (166° vs 161°, P = .2), external rotation (62° vs. 58.4°, P = .5), or internal rotation (T7.4 vs T8.2, P = .07) between the stiff and nonstiff groups, respectively. There were no differences in final ASES (83 vs 79, P = .57) and Constant-Murley scores (77 vs. 74, P = .5). Repeat MRI suggested a trend toward a lower retear rate among the stiff patients (70% intact in stiff group vs 36% in nonstiff group, P = .079). Two clinically significant cuff retears occurred in the nonstiff cohort.

Discussion

Concerns for recalcitrant stiffness have led some to favor early postoperative therapy. We found that early restriction of motion did not lead to long-term stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, even in patients who were clinically stiff in the early postoperative period.

Conclusions

Sling immobilization for 6 weeks after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair does not result in increased long-term stiffness and may improve the rate of tendon healing.

Level of evidence: Level IV, Case Series, Treatment Study

Keywords: Shoulder, rotator cuff repair, immobilization, healing, rehabilitation, stiffness

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(10)00150-3

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.006

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 7 , Pages 1034-1039, October 2010