Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 77-85, January 2011

A comparison of perioperative outcomes in patients with and without rheumatoid arthritis after receiving a total shoulder replacement arthroplasty

  • Dustin Hambright, BA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
  • ,
  • Robert A. Henderson, BA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
  • ,
  • Chad Cook, PhD, PT

      Affiliations

    • Centers for Excellence in Surgical Outcomes, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
  • ,
  • Ted Worrell, PT, EdD

      Affiliations

    • Community and Family Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
  • ,
  • Claude T. Moorman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
  • ,
  • Michael P. Bolognesi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Michael P. Bolognesi, MD, Atten: Dustin Hambright, Duke University Medical Center, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Box 3269 Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27710

published online 26 July 2010.

Hypothesis

The long-term survival rate of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is comparable to hip and knee arthroplasty. Although TSA is considered a safe and effective procedure with low complications in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), data are lacking on perioperative complications. Complication rates and hospital disposition differences between patients with and without RA who underwent TSA were investigated. We hypothesized that RA patients would have poorer perioperative outcomes after TSA.

Materials and methods

Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to capture 25,398 patients between 1988 and 2005 who underwent TSA. Of these, 1,186 patients had a primary diagnosis of RA and were compared with 24,212 patients without RA. Analyses addressed perioperative complications and hospital disposition factors using bivariate and logistic regression models.

Results

Overall complication rates were exceptionally low in both groups. Hospital disposition factors were significantly different between the 2 groups. The RA cohort had shorter average lengths of stay, higher likelihood of routine discharge, and lower inflation-adjusted cost before and after adjustment for covariates.

Discussion

The occurrence of complications in the perioperative setting was less than 1% for both study groups in most variables investigated, and there were only minimal differences in perioperative complications between the groups. The significant differences in hospital disposition factors suggest that patients with RA may have less complex hospital stays and may be more comfortable being discharged under their own care. Recent studies describing the overall improvement in the management of patients with RA may also help explain these findings.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that the perioperative complications of a total shoulder replacement for patients with and without RA are similar. Contrary to our expectations, TSA patients with RA had shorter and less costly hospital stays and were more likely to have routine discharge. Complications are likely more long-term in nature than detected in this study and require longer follow-up beyond perioperative periods for fruition.

Level of evidence: Level III, Retrospective Cohort Study, Treatment Study

Keywords: Complications, hospitalization, Nationwide Inpatient Sample, rheumatoid arthritis, total shoulder replacement

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(10)00117-5

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.03.005

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 77-85, January 2011