Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 6 , Pages 829-836, September 2010

Validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford Shoulder Score

  • Thomas Berendes, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic surgery & Traumatology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Thomas D. Berendes, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Peter Pilot, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic surgery & Traumatology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
  • ,
  • Jaap Willems, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam
  • ,
  • Hennie Verburg, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic surgery & Traumatology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
  • ,
  • Ron te Slaa, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic surgery & Traumatology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands

published online 26 April 2010.

Background

The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is an internationally-used patient-based outcome score. Up to now, it was not validated in Dutch. The purpose of this study was to produce a Dutch translation of the OSS and to test this version in terms of reliability and validity.

Methods

Translation of the OSS was done according to the guidelines in literature. One hundred and three patients completed the Dutch version of the OSS. Additionally, the Constant-Murley shoulder score, the (Dutch) Simple Shoulder Test (DSST) score, and SF-36 were included into the validation process. Feasibility and patient-burden parameters were also tested.

Results

One-hundred and three patients with general shoulder problems age 55 years (min-max: 21-81 ± 13yrs), sex ratio 2/3 (f/m) completed the Dutch version of the OSS and the SF-36. Internal consistency tested by the Cronbach's alpha (0.921) was high. Intra-class correlation coefficient was R = .981 (95% confidence interval: .961 – .993) and the mean difference between both tests was 2.7 points (0-8). Construct validity was also tested by the Pearson correlation coefficient and showed a significant correlation (P < .01) between the Dutch version of the OSS and the other scores (DSST 0.61; the Constant-Murley score 0.64 and with most of the SF-36 sub-scores, except for 2 psychometric subscales, namely, mental health (0.15 [P = .123]) and general health (0.10 [P = .316])

Conclusion

The instrument proved to be valid by demonstrating significant correlations predicted by standard clinical assessments (DSST and Constant-Murley scores) and a generic patient-based instrument (SF-36). Application and evaluation in clinical trial proved feasible and understandable.

Level of evidence: Level IV, Case Series, Diagnosis Study

Keywords: Shoulder, questionnaire, validity

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(10)00040-6

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.01.017

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 6 , Pages 829-836, September 2010