« Previous
Next »
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 2,
Supplement
, Pages 83-90
, March 2010
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Scientific rationale, surgical technique, and early clinical and functional results of a knotless self-reinforcing double-row rotator cuff repair system
References
- . Outcome and structural integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using 2 rows of fixation: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1899–1905
- . Rotator cuff tears: The effect of the reconstruction method on three-dimensional repair site area. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:519–526
- . Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: A prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15:290–299
- Arthroscopic assisted rotator cuff repair: results using a mini-open deltoid splitting approach. Arthroscopy. 1996;12:50–59
- . Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal?. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1229–1240
- . Open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a comparative view of 96 cases. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:597–604
- . A biomechanical comparison of 2 techniques of footprint reconstruction for rotator cuff repair: The SwiveLock-FiberChain construct versus standard double-row repair. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:274–281
- . Partial repair of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:363–370
- . A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single and double-row rotator cuff repair magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:674–682
- . Arthrography of the shoulder after operative repair of the torn rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68:147–150
- . Can a double-row anchorage technique improve tendon healing in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study of double-row and single-row anchorage techniques with computed tomographic arthrography tendon healing assessment. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1247–1257
- . Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Prospective evaluation at minimum 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:e22
- . Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: An anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:662–669
- . Rotator cuff repair: an ex vivo analysis of suture anchor repair techniques on initial load to failure. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1236–1241
- ElAttrache NS, Park MC, Tibone JE, Ahmad CS, Bong JJ, Lee TQ. Arthroscopic “Transosseous equivalent” rotator cuff repair, http://www.arthrex.com/myarthrex/videos/index.cfm?myURL=1085_01FF&Bandwidth=Auto&VideoID=55&sortfeature=title&sort=asc&specialty=SURG-11#55; DVD-1085; downloaded 08/21/09.
- . Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: Results according to the degree of rotator cuff tear. Arthroscopy. 1988;4:241–249
- . Mini-open rotator cuff repair using a two-row fixation technique: outcomes analysis in patients with small, moderate, and large rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:665–670
- Equivalent clinical results of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1254–1260
- . The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:219–224
- . Arthroscopic management of rotator cuff disease. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998;6:259–266
- . Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998;80A:832–840
- . Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994;76:371–380
- . Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A prospective randomized clinical study. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:4–12
- . Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg. 1991;73:982–989
- . Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with double-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1248–1257
- Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:407–414
- . Functional and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation after single-tendon rotator cuff reconstruction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8:242–246
- . The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1533–1541
- . Comparison of open and arthroscopic subacromial decompression. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3:1–11
- . Arthroscopic assisted rotator cuff repair: Preliminary results. Arthroscopy. 1990;6:55–60
- . Arthroscopically assisted rotator cuff repair: Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:54–60
- . Double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Re-establishing the footprint of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:1035–1042
- . Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with singlerow fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:403–410
- . Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1861–1868
- . The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:1168–1173
- . Rotator cuff repair: The effect of double-row fixation on three-dimensional repair site. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15:691–696
- . Mattress double anchor footprint repair: A novel, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair technique. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:875–879
- Millett PJ, Warner JJ, Johnston TL. Clinical results of double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Unpublished data.
- . Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1824–1828
- . Arthroscopic subacromial decompression versus open acromioplasty. Arthroscopy. 1989;5:321–323
- . Comparison of the clinical outcomes of single- and doublerow repairs in rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1310–1316
- . “Transosseous-equivalent” rotator cuff repair technique. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:1360;e1-e5
- . Part I: Footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:461–468
- . Part II: biomechanical assessment for a footprint-restoring arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:469–476
- . Arthroscopically enhanced “miniapproach” to rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:19–25
- . All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A long-term retrospective outcome comparison. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:234–238
- A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2425–2431
- Snyder SJ. Single vs. double row suture anchor fixation rotator cuff repair. Presented at the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Specialty Day at the 75th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2007 Mar 8; San Francisco, CA.
- . Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair: a prospective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:953–960
- . Anchor design and bone mineral density affect the pull-out strength of suture anchors in rotator cuff repair: which anchors are best to use in patients with low bone quality?. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1466–1473
- . Subacromial impingement: Open versus arthroscopic decompression. Arthroscopy. 1992;8:173–178
- . Rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical comparison of three techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:493–497
- . Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a cohort comparison study. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:328–332
PII: S1058-2746(09)00566-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.12.012
© 2010 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 2,
Supplement
, Pages 83-90
, March 2010
