Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 6 , Pages 814-822 , September 2010

Quality of life and functional outcome after a 2-part proximal humeral fracture: A prospective cohort study on 50 patients treated with a locking plate

  • Per Olerud, MD

      Affiliations

    • Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Section of Orthopaedics, Stockholm Söder Hospital, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Per Olerud, MD, Department of Orthopaedics, Stockholm Söder Hospital, S - 118 83 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • ,
  • Leif Ahrengart, MD

      Affiliations

    • Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Section of Orthopaedics, Stockholm Söder Hospital, Sweden
  • ,
  • Anita Söderqvist, RN

      Affiliations

    • Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Section of Orthopaedics, Stockholm Söder Hospital, Sweden
  • ,
  • Jenny Saving, MD

      Affiliations

    • Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Section of Orthopaedics, Stockholm Söder Hospital, Sweden
  • ,
  • Jan Tidermark, MD

      Affiliations

    • Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Section of Orthopaedics, Stockholm Söder Hospital, Sweden
    • Department of Orthopaedics, Capio S:t Görans Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

References 

  1. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Andersson B, Dahlgren E, Johansson A. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:613–618
  2. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:128–146
  3. Björkenheim JM, Pajarinen J, Savolainen V. Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a locking compression plate: a retrospective evaluation of 72 patients followed for a minimum of 1 year. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:741–745
  4. Blomfeldt R, Törnkvist H, Eriksson K, Söderqvist A, Ponzer S, Tidermark J. A randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:160–165
  5. Borgström F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Svensson O, et al. Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:637–650
  6. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37:53–72
  7. Brunner F, Sommer C, Bahrs C, Heuwinkel R, Hafner C, Rillmann P, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:163–172
  8. Burström K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F. Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:621–635
  9. Constant C. Age related recovery of shoulder function after injury. Thesis 1986, University College, Cork, Ireland.
  10. Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJ, Sojbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P. A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17:355–361
  11. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop. 1987;214:160–164
  12. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006;37:691–697
  13. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. The time trade-off method: results from a general population study. Health Econ. 1996;5:141–154
  14. Ekström W, Nemeth G, Samnegard E, Dalen N, Tidermark J. Quality of life after a subtrochanteric fracture: a prospective cohort study on 87 elderly patients. Injury. 2009;40:371–376
  15. Gardner MJ, Weil Y, Barker JU, Kelly BT, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21:185–191
  16. Gille J, Schulz AP, Queitsch C, Paech A, Jurgens C. Initial results of the s3-humerus plate. Open Orthop J. 2008;2:133–136
  17. Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:11
  18. Handschin AE, Cardell M, Contaldo C, Trentz O, Wanner GA. Functional results of angular-stable plate fixation in displaced proximal humeral fractures. Injury. 2008;39:306–313
  19. Hirschmann MT, Quarz V, Audige L, Ludin D, Messmer P, Regazzoni P, et al. Internal fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures with an anatomically preshaped interlocking plate: a clinical and radiologic evaluation. J Trauma. 2007;63:1314–1323
  20. Horak J, Nilsson BE. Epidemiology of fracture of the upper end of the humerus. Clin Orthop. 1975;112:250–253
  21. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602–608
  22. Kanis JA, Melton LJ, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9:1137–1141
  23. Katz S, Ford A, Moskowitz R, Jackson B, Jaffe M. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychological function. JAMA. 1963;185:94–99
  24. Miedel R, Ponzer S, Tornkvist H, Söderqvist A, Tidermark J. The standard Gamma nail or the Medoff sliding plate for unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. A randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:68–75
  25. Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1077–1089
  26. Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1090–1103
  27. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology. 1978;49:239–243
  28. Padua R, Bondi R, Ceccarelli E, Campi A, Padua L. Health-related quality of life and subjective outcome after shoulder replacement for proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17:261–264
  29. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975;23:433–441
  30. Robinson CM, Christie J. The two-part proximal humeral fracture: a review of operative treatment using two techniques. Injury. 1993;24:123–125
  31. Rouleau DM, Laflamme GY, Berry GK, Harvey EJ, Delisle J, Girard J. Proximal humerus fractures treated by percutaneous locking plate internal fixation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:56–62
  32. Sosef N, Stobbe I, Hogervorst M, Mommers L, Verbruggen J, van der Elst M, et al. The Polarus intramedullary nail for proximal humeral fractures: outcome in 28 patients followed for 1 year. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:436–441
  33. Tejwani NC, Liporace F, Walsh M, France MA, Zuckerman JD, Egol KA. Functional outcome following one-part proximal humeral fractures: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17:216–219
  34. Tidermark J, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Söderqvist A, Törnkvist H. Internal fixation compared with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. A randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:380–388
  35. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483

PII: S1058-2746(09)00538-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.11.046

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 6 , Pages 814-822 , September 2010