Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 4 , Pages 495-501, June 2010

Biomechanical comparison of a proximal humeral locking plate using two methods of head fixation

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wright State University, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH

published online 02 March 2010.

Hypothesis

Locking plates have emerged as the implant of choice for stabilization of proximal humeral fractures. The biomechanical properties of a locked plating system using smooth pegs vs threaded screws for fixation of the humeral head were compared to test the hypothesis that there would be no biomechanical difference between pegs and threaded screws.

Materials and methods

Sixteen pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric humeri were randomized to have a surgical neck gap osteotomy stabilized with a locked plate using threaded screws (n=8) or smooth pegs (n=8). The intact contralateral humerus served as a control. Each specimen was tested with simultaneous cyclic axial compression (40Nm) and torsion (both ±2Nm and ±5Nm) for 6000 cycles. All specimens were loaded to failure. Interfragmentary motion and load-displacement curves were analyzed to identify differences between the groups. Our data were then compared to previously published forces across the glenohumeral joint to provide evidence based recommendations for postoperative use of the shoulder.

Results

There was a statistically significant difference between test specimens and their paired control (P < .001) in cyclic testing and load to failure. Differences between the smooth pegs and threaded screws were not statistically significant.

Discussion

There is no biomechanical difference between locked smooth pegs and locked threaded screws for proximal fragment fixation in an unstable 2-part proximal humeral fracture model.

Conclusion

Our study contributes to the published evidence evaluating forces across the glenohumeral joint and suggests that early use of the affected extremity for simple activities of daily living may be safe. Use of the arm for assisted ambulation requiring a crutch, cane, walker, or wheelchair should be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Level of evidence: Basic Science Study, Biomechanical Testing

Keywords: Proximal humerus, fracture, locked, locking, biomechanical

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(09)00473-X

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.11.003

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 4 , Pages 495-501, June 2010