Reliability of the glenoid plane
Hypothesis
The purpose of this study was to investigate the 3-dimensional (3-D) orientation of the glenoid and scapular planes. Different definitions of the glenoid plane were used and different planes measured, and we hypothesed that the 3-D plane with the least variation would be best to define the most reliable glenoid plane.
Methods
We studied 150 CT scans from nonpathological shoulders from patients between 18 and 80. The scapular plane and 5 different glenoid planes were determined: inferior, anterior, posterior, superior, and neutral. All plane versions and inclination angles were measured. Because all examinations were done in a standardized position to the coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes of the body, the scapular plane could be defined versus the coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes of the body.
Results
The version (mean, 3.76) of the inferior glenoid plane showed a significantly lower standard deviation than the version of the anterior (P < .001), posterior (P
=
.001), and superior (P
=
.001) glenoid plane (ANOVA). For inclination all planes have a similar variance. The scapular plane was different between gender (P
=
.022) and correlated with age.
Conclusion
This study showed that the retroversion of the inferior glenoid is reasonably constant. The osseous anthropometry of the inferior glenoid can offer a reproducible point of reference to be used in prosthetic surgery of the shoulder.
Level of evidence: Level II, Basic Science Study, Anatomical Survey
Keywords: Glenoid cavity, anthropometry, plane of reference, variability, retroversion, prosthetic surgery, inferior glenoid circle, scapular plane
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Ethical approval: Ethical approval was cleared from the ethics committee University Hospital Ghent - Chairman Prof. dr. R. Rubens (EC/2009-099/Svdm: The normal glenohumeral relationships: a 3-Dimensional CT-scan stduy of the humeral and glenoid planes in one hundred and fifty normal shoulders).
PII: S1058-2746(09)00454-6
doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.005
© 2010 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
