Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 18, Issue 1 , Pages 13-20, January 2009

Prospective analysis of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Prognostic factors affecting clinical and ultrasound outcome

  • Shane J. Nho, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Shane J. Nho, MD, MS, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 1063, Chicago, IL 60612.
  • ,
  • Barrett S. Brown, MD

      Affiliations

    • Fondren Orthopedic Group, Texas Orthopedic Hospital, Houston, TX
  • ,
  • Stephen Lyman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Ronald S. Adler, PhD, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
  • ,
  • David W. Altchek, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
  • ,
  • John D. MacGillivray, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY

published online 17 September 2008.

Summary 

The purpose of this study was to identify potential predictors of function and tendon healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair that will enable the orthopaedic surgeon to determine which patients can expect a successful outcome. Between 2003 and 2005, the Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Registry was established to collect demographic, intraoperative, functional outcome, and ultrasound data prospectively on all patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. At total of 193 patients met the study criteria, and 127 (65.8%) completed the 2-year follow-up. The most significant independent factors affecting ultrasound outcome were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.14; P = .006) and tear size (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.55-3.38; P < .001). After adjustment for age and tear size, the intraoperative factors found to be significantly associated with a tendon defect were concomitant biceps procedures (OR, 11.39; 95% CI, 2.90-44.69; P < .001) and acromioclavicular joint procedures (OR, 3.85; 95% CI, 1.46-10.12; P = .006). In contrast to the ultrasound data, the functional outcome variables, such as satisfaction (OR, 3.92; 95% CI, 2.00-7.68; P < .001) and strength (OR, 10.05; 95% CI, 1.61-62.77; P = .01), had a greater role in predicting an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score greater than 90. The progression from a single-tendon rotator cuff tear to a multiple-tendon tear with associated pathology increased the likelihood of tendon defect by at least 9 times, and therefore, earlier surgical intervention for isolated, single-tendon rotator cuff tears could optimize the likelihood of ultrasound healing and an excellent functional outcome.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(08)00470-9

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2008.05.045

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 18, Issue 1 , Pages 13-20, January 2009