Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 17, Issue 3 , Pages 399-409, May 2008

Natural history of complex fractures of the proximal humerus using a three-dimensional classification system

  • Gordon Edelson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Orthopedic Department, Poriya Government Hospital, Tiberias, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Gordon Edelson, MD, Orthopedic Department, Poriya Government Hospital, Tiberias, Israel.
  • ,
  • Husam Safuri, MD

      Affiliations

    • Orthopedic Department, Poriya Government Hospital, Tiberias, Israel
  • ,
  • Joseph Salami, MD

      Affiliations

    • Orthopedic Department, Poriya Government Hospital, Tiberias, Israel
  • ,
  • Fina Vigder, MD

      Affiliations

    • Radiology Department, Poriya Government Hospital, Tiberias, Israel
  • ,
  • Daniela Militianu, MD

      Affiliations

    • MRI/Radiology Department, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel

published online 18 February 2008.

We studied the nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fractures in severe injuries usually treated surgically. The natural history of 63 patients was followed prospectively for 2 to 9 years (mean, 42 months) with a nonrandomized protocol. A 3-dimensional classification system based on computed tomography scans was used to categorize the fractures. Assessment was made for range of motion, function via a validated testing instrument (Simple Shoulder Test), analog pain score, avascular necrosis (AVN), and fracture union. Magnetic resonance imaging for early signs of AVN was done in 16 cases. After conservative treatment of complex fractures of the shoulder, motion is considerably compromised but pain is minimal and functional status is acceptable to most individuals in this predominantly older patient population. Status comparable to a successful surgical shoulder fusion is achieved in most cases—Nature's fusion. Contrary to common belief, AVN, even in severely displaced injuries, is rare. Future randomized studies based on a 3-dimensional classification need to be done to compare these natural history results with various types of surgical interventions.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(08)00003-7

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2007.08.014

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 17, Issue 3 , Pages 399-409, May 2008