Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 202-209, March 2008

Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus: A minimum five-year follow-up

  • Samuel A. Antuña, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Valle del Nalón-University of Oviedo, Principado de Asturias, Spain
  • ,
  • John W. Sperling, MD, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: John W. Sperling, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
  • ,
  • Robert H. Cofield, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

published online 21 January 2008.

Significant discrepancy in the functional outcome of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures has been reported with short or mid-term follow-up. This study reports the long-term results and rate of complications of shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. The review comprised 57 patients (44 women, 13 men) who underwent hemiarthroplasty between 1976 and 1996 as treatment of a proximal humerus fracture and who had a minimum 5-year follow-up (mean, 10.3 years). The mean patient age was 66 years at the time of surgery (range, 23-89 years). According to a modified Neer result rating system, results were satisfactory in 27 patients and unsatisfactory in 30. The mean active elevation was 100° (range, 20°-180°) and external rotation was 30° (range, 0°-90°). At the most recent follow-up, 9 patients (16%) had moderate or severe pain and 2 required implant revision or removal. The study data suggest that patients undergoing arthroplasty as treatment of an acute fracture of the proximal humerus may achieve satisfactory long-term pain relief; however, the result for overall shoulder motion is less predictable. In view of these results, current indications, surgical technique, and postoperative treatment may need to be revisited.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(07)00613-1

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.025

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 202-209, March 2008