Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 16, Issue 6 , Pages 774-781, November 2007

Percutaneous fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures: Indications based on the correlation between clinical and radiographic results

  • Emilio Calvo, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Emilio Calvo, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Avda Reyes Católicos, 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
  • ,
  • Ignacio de Miguel, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Juan J. de la Cruz, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad Autónoma, Madrid, Spain.
  • ,
  • Néstor López-Martín, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain

published online 29 October 2007.

We evaluated 74 patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures (mean age, 70.9 years) treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Fractures were classified radiographically following Neer’s system, and the quality of reduction was assessed according to Kristiansen and Kofoed. Patients were also evaluated clinically with the Constant scale. Overall, the reduction was good in 72% of fractures, but the probability of obtaining a satisfactory reduction of displaced tuberosities was significantly lower in comparison to the humeral head. Four-part fractures obtained the worst radiographic results. The mean Constant scores were 65.8 ± 18 points for the injured shoulder and 79.5 ± 9.1 points for the opposite shoulder. Clinical results correlated with the quality of reduction. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning should be reserved for 2-part fractures, but the technique can also be used in 3-part fractures in elderly patients, in whom an incomplete reduction can yield satisfactory clinical results.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(07)00397-7

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.019

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 16, Issue 6 , Pages 774-781, November 2007