Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 16, Issue 6 , Pages 717-721, November 2007

Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score

  • Michael K. Gilbart, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Zürich, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Christian Gerber, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, University of Zürich, Uniklinik Balgrist, Zürich, Switzerland.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Christian Gerber, MD, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Zurich, Balgrist, Forchstrasse 340, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the subjective shoulder value (SSV) and to compare it with the Constant score (CS). The SSV is defined as a patient’s subjective shoulder assessment expressed as a percentage of an entirely normal shoulder, which would score 100%. Patients who underwent operative treatment for rotator cuff repair (n = 247), arthroplasty (n = 83), or stabilization for recurrent anterior instability (n = 111) were included in this study. Correlation between the SSV and CS was highest postoperatively and was higher in the rotator cuff group (0.80) than in the osteoarthritis (0.69) and instability (0.61) groups. The relative CS could reliably predict the variance in the SSV in patients with rotator cuff tears (54%) and osteoarthritis (41%) and, to a lesser extent, in instability patients (23%). The SSV is an easily administered, responsive, and valid measure of shoulder function. The SSV may offer an improvement over the CS in assessing shoulder instability patients, as the CS may overestimate the results of these patients.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(07)00334-5

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.123

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 16, Issue 6 , Pages 717-721, November 2007