Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 16, Issue 3, Supplement , Pages S59-S64, May 2007

Biomechanical evaluation of subscapularis repair used during shoulder arthroplasty

  • Christopher S. Ahmad, MD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Shoulder, Elbow, and Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY
    • Center for Orthopaedic Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Christopher S. Ahmad, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, 622 W 168th St, PH 11th Floor, New York, NY 10032.
  • ,
  • David Wing, BS

      Affiliations

    • Center for Orthopaedic Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Thomas R. Gardner, MCE

      Affiliations

    • Center for Orthopaedic Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • ,
  • William N. Levine, MD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Shoulder, Elbow, and Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY
    • Center for Orthopaedic Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Louis U. Bigliani, MD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Shoulder, Elbow, and Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY
    • Center for Orthopaedic Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY

published online 14 December 2006.

Dysfunction of the subscapularis after total shoulder replacement has become concerning and may represent poor tendon healing after surgical repair. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the restoration of subscapularis footprint anatomy and failure strength for subscapularis repair via transosseous tunnels and a second anatomic repair via combined transosseous tunnels and direct tendon-to-tendon repair. Six matched pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were used, with one shoulder from each pair randomly assigned to a transosseous repair and the contralateral shoulder assigned to a combined transosseous tunnel and direct tendon-to-tendon repair. The repair footprint was digitized. Cyclic loading to the tendon repair was performed followed by a constant ramp displacement to complete failure. The transosseous tunnel repair insertional footprint area (228.6 mm2) was significantly less than that of the native footprint (697.3 mm2), and the footprint centroid moved 9.1 mm medially (P = .0001) and 5.5 mm superiorly (P = .003). The combined repair required a statistically significantly greater number of cycles (P = .028) to reach a 5-mm gap (205.7 ± 65.1) than did the isolated transosseous tunnel technique (76.4 ± 34.2). A similar greater number of cycles was observed for the 10-mm gap (P = .01) for combined repair (307.5 ± 82.4) compared with isolated transosseous repair (166.2 ± 85.8). This study has shown that transosseous tunnel repair alters subscapularis insertional anatomy, resulting in weaker strength of fixation and less contact area when compared with combined transosseous tunnel and direct tendon-to-tendon repair.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(06)00267-9

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.002

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 16, Issue 3, Supplement , Pages S59-S64, May 2007