Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 1-5, January 2007

Outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs

  • Edward Lee, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Julie Y. Bishop, MD

      Affiliations

    • Columbus Bone, Joint & Hand Surgeons, Columbus, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Jonathan P. Braman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Leni and Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedics, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
  • ,
  • Joshua Langford, MD

      Affiliations

    • Leni and Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedics, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
  • ,
  • Jonathan Gelber, MD

      Affiliations

    • Leni and Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedics, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
  • ,
  • Evan L. Flatow, MD

      Affiliations

    • Leni and Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedics, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Evan L. Flatow, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 5 E 98th St, Box 1188, New York, NY, 10029.

published online 04 October 2006.

Recently, advances in arthroscopic techniques have allowed shoulder surgeons to perform fully arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears. Outcome data have shown that improvement is inconsistent between studies. We performed a retrospective review of 105 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from 1999 to 2002. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation consisted of a history, questionnaire, and examination to determine American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Constant, and visual analog pain scores. Complete data were available for a minimum of 12 months (range, 12-45 months) for 71 patients. Increases in range of motion and outcome scores and associated reductions in visual analog scores were all significant. With massive tears, scores and pain were significantly improved. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair reliably improves functional deficits and pain regardless of tear size. Smaller tears yield significant improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Constant, and pain scores. Functional improvement was seen with massive tears, but gains in strength and motion were less dramatic.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(06)00142-X

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2006.04.007

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 1-5, January 2007