Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 4, Issue 4 , Pages 271-280, July 1995

Late prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty for displaced proximal humerus fractures

    MD
  • Tom R. Norris

      Affiliations

    • California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco USA
    • Brown University-Rhode Island Hospital; Providence, USA
    • Oak Knoll Naval Hospital, Oakland USA
  • , MD
  • Andrew Green

      Affiliations

    • California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco USA
    • Brown University-Rhode Island Hospital; Providence, USA
    • Oak Knoll Naval Hospital, Oakland USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Andrew Green, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital, 2 Dudley St., Providence, RI 02905.
  • , LCDR, MC, USNR
  • Francis X. McGuigan

      Affiliations

    • California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco USA
    • Brown University-Rhode Island Hospital; Providence, USA
    • Oak Knoll Naval Hospital, Oakland USA

Twenty-three shoulders in 23 patients with failed treatment of three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures subsequently treated with prosthetic arthroplasty were reviewed. The initial treatment was closed in 10 cases and open in 13. The complications of treatment included malunions in 17, nonunions in four, traumatic arthritis in 14, avascular necrosis in nine, humeral shortening in six, and deltoid paresis in four. In 20 cases prosthetic arthroplasty was performed an average of 15.8 months after injury. Three other cases had arthroplasty 19, 20, and 22 years after the original fracture. Seventeen were treated with a total shoulder arthroplasty, and six had a humeral head replacement. Thirteen had a tuberosity osteotomy, and eight had lengthening of the subscapularis tendon. Prosthetic arthroplasty reduced the shoulder pain in 22 (95%). Average active forward elevation increased from 68° to 92°, and active external rotation increased from 6° to 27°. After arthroplasty 53% of the patients were able to do activities at or above shoulder level compared with 15% before arthroplasty. Late surgery for failed early treatment is technically difficult, and the results are inferior to those reported for acute humeral head replacement. These findings should be considered when treatment is selected for acute three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures. Nonetheless late arthroplasty is a satisfactory reconstructive option when primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures fails.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(05)80020-5

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 4, Issue 4 , Pages 271-280, July 1995