Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 16, Issue 3, Supplement , Pages S9-S12 , May 2007

Biomechanical comparison of component position and hardware failure in the reverse shoulder prosthesis

  • Sergio Gutiérrez, MS

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Foundation, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, FL
    • Biomechanics Laboratory, Biomedical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
    • ,
  • R. Michael Greiwe, MD

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Foundation, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, FL
    • College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
    • ,
  • Mark A. Frankle, MD

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Foundation, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, FL
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Mark A. Frankle, MD, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, 13020 N Telecom Pkwy, Temple Terrace, FL 33637.
    • ,
  • Steven Siegal, MD

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Foundation, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, FL
    • ,
  • William E. Lee III, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Biomechanics Laboratory, Biomedical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL

References 

  1. Arman F. Total shoulder arthroplasty vs. hemiarthroplasty. [in German]. Zentralbl Chir. 2003;128:17–21
  2. Arntz CT, Jackins S, Matsen FA. Prosthetic replacement of the shoulder for the treatment of defects in the rotator cuff and the surface of the glenohumeral joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:485–491
  3. Baulot E, Chabernaud D, Grammont PM. Results of Grammont’s inverted prosthesis in omarthritis associated with major cuff destruction (Apropos of 16 cases). [in French] Acta Orthop Belg. 1995;61(Suppl 1):112–119
  4. Brostrom LA, Wallensten R, Olsson E, Anderson D. The Kessel prosthesis in total shoulder arthroplasty (A five-year experience). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;155–160
  5. Cameron HU, Pilliar RM, MacNab I. The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 1973;7:301–311
  6. Cofield RH. Shoulder arthrodesis and resection arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 1985;34:268–277
  7. Coughlin MJ, Morris JM, West WF. The semiconstrained total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:574–581
  8. De Wilde L, Mombert M, Van Petegem P, Verdonk R. Revision of shoulder replacement with a reversed shoulder prosthesis (Delta III): report of five cases. Acta Orthop Belg. 2001;67:348–353
  9. Ducheyne P, De Meester P, Aernoudt E. Influence of a functional dynamic loading on bone ingrowth into surface pores of orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1977;11:811–838
  10. Einhorn TA, Simon SR. Orthopaedic basic science: biology and biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. 2nd ed. Rosemont (IL): American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2000;
  11. Field LD, Dines DM, Zabinski SJ, Warren RF. Hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder for rotator cuff arthropathy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997;6:18–23
  12. Franklin JL, Barrett WP, Jackins SE, Matsen FA. Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty (Association with rotator cuff deficiency). J Arthroplasty. 1988;3:39–46
  13. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Zilber S, Van Driessche S. Shoulder surgery: from cuff repair to joint replacement (An update). Joint Bone Spine. 2003;70:422–432
  14. Grammont PM, Baulot E. Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics. 1993;16:65–68
  15. Habermeyer P, Ebert T. Current status and perspectives of shoulder replacement. [in German] Unfallchirurg. 1999;102:668–683
  16. Harman M, Frankle MA, Vasey MB, Banks S. Initial glenoid component fixation, the “reverse” total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical evaluation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(Suppl S):162S–167S
  17. Jasty M, Bragdon C, Burke D, O’Connor D, Lowenstein J, Harris WH. In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:707–714
  18. Jasty M, Bragdon CR, Zalenski E, O’Connor D, Page A, Harris WH. Enhanced stability of uncemented canine femoral components by bone ingrowth into the porous coatings. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:106–113
  19. Lee TQ, Barnett SL, Kim WC. Effects of screw types in cementless fixation of tibial tray implants: stability and strength assessment. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999;14:258–264
  20. Naranja RJ, Iannotti JP. Surgical options in the treatment of arthritis of the shoulder: alternatives to prosthetic arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 1995;6:204–213
  21. Neer CS, Watson KC, Stanton FJ. Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:319–337
  22. Nwakama AC, Cofield RH, Kavanagh BF, Loehr JF. Semiconstrained total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis and massive rotator cuff tearing. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000;9:302–307
  23. Orfaly RM, Rockwood CA, Esenyel CZ, Wirth MA. A prospective functional outcome study of shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12:214–221
  24. Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Welsh RP, Binnington AG. Radiographic and morphologic studies of load-bearing porous-surfaced structured implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;249–257
  25. Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;108–113
  26. Post M, Jablon M. Constrained total shoulder arthroplasty (Long-term follow-up observations). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;109–116
  27. Pugh DM, McKee MD. Advances in the management of humeral nonunion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11:48–59
  28. Qin YX, McLeod KJ, Guilak F, Chiang FP, Rubin CT. Correlation of bony ingrowth to the distribution of stress and strain parameters surrounding a porous-coated implant. J Orthop Res. 1996;14:862–870
  29. Rittmeister M, Kerschbaumer F. Grammont reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and nonreconstructible rotator cuff lesions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:17–22
  30. Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff (Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:388–395
  31. Souter WA. The surgical treatment of the rheumatoid shoulder. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1983;12:243–255
  32. Trail IA, Nuttall D. The results of shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:1121–1125
  33. Valenti P, Boutens D, Nerot C. Delta III reversed prosthesis for osteoarthritis with massive rotator cuff tear: long term results (>5 years). In:  Walch G,  Boileau P,  Mole D editor. 2000 Shoulder prosthesis: two to ten year follow-up. Montpellier: Sauramps Medical; 2001;p. 253–259
  34. Whiteside LA. Four screws for fixation of the tibial component in cementless total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;72–76
  35. Zeman CA, Arcand MA, Cantrell JS, Skedros JG, Burkhead WZ. The rotator cuff-deficient arthritic shoulder: diagnosis and surgical management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998;6:337–348

PII: S1058-2746(05)00386-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.11.008

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 16, Issue 3, Supplement , Pages S9-S12 , May 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution