Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 16, Issue 3, Supplement , Pages S9-S12, May 2007

Biomechanical comparison of component position and hardware failure in the reverse shoulder prosthesis

  • Sergio Gutiérrez, MS

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Foundation, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, FL
    • Biomechanics Laboratory, Biomedical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
  • ,
  • R. Michael Greiwe, MD

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Foundation, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, FL
    • College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
  • ,
  • Mark A. Frankle, MD

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Foundation, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, FL
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Mark A. Frankle, MD, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, 13020 N Telecom Pkwy, Temple Terrace, FL 33637.
  • ,
  • Steven Siegal, MD

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Foundation, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, FL
  • ,
  • William E. Lee III, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Biomechanics Laboratory, Biomedical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL

published online 21 September 2006.

There has been renewed interest in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of glenohumeral arthritis with concomitant rotator cuff deficiency. Failure of the prosthesis at the glenoid attachment site remains a concern. The purpose of this study was to examine glenoid component stability with regard to the angle of implantation. This investigation entailed a biomechanical analysis to evaluate forces and micromotion in glenoid components attached to 12 polyurethane blocks at −15°, 0°, and +15° of superior and inferior tilt. The 15° inferior tilt had the most uniform compressive forces and the least amount of tensile forces and micromotion when compared with the 0° and 15° superiorly tilted baseplate. Our results suggest that implantation with an inferior tilt will reduce the incidence of mechanical failure of the glenoid component in a reverse shoulder prosthesis.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(05)00386-1

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2005.11.008

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 16, Issue 3, Supplement , Pages S9-S12, May 2007