Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 15, Issue 4 , Pages 399-401, July 2006

A radiographic evaluation of birotational head motion in the bipolar shoulder hemiarthroplasty

  • Peter Stavrou, MBBS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre and Repatriation General Hospital and Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia
  • ,
  • John Slavotinek, FRACR

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Imaging, Flinders Medical Centre and Repatriation General Hospital and Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia
  • ,
  • Jegan Krishnan, FRACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre and Repatriation General Hospital and Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Associate Professor J Krishnan, FRACS, Senior Clinical Director, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042.

The concept of bipolar hemiarthroplasty has been described in the hip for more than 20 years, its role being to decrease acetabular wear. Shoulder bipolar hemiarthroplasty was described shortly afterward. The purpose of this study was to determine if the prosthesis acted as a bipolar device moving primarily at the inner metal on polyethylene bearing as intended, or as a unipolar hemiarthroplasty moving at the outer metal on glenoid surface articulation. Eleven bipolar shoulder hemiarthroplasties, with a minimum follow-up of 22 months, were examined fluoroscopically. The proportion of arm abduction occurring at the scapulothoracic articulation and between the two components of the bipolar hemiarthroplasty was assessed and compared with that of normal patients and those with total shoulder replacements previously reported in the literature. The results of this study show that most of the movement in active arm abduction occurred at the scapulothoracic articulation and that the bipolar hemiarthroplasty acted predominantly as a unipolar device.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(05)00312-5

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2005.10.002

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 15, Issue 4 , Pages 399-401, July 2006