Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 15, Issue 5 , Pages 541-548, September 2006

Ultrasound evaluation and clinical correlation of subscapularis repair after total shoulder arthroplasty

  • April Armstrong, MD, MSc, FRCSC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Cyrus Lashgari, MD

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Center, Annapolis, MD, USA, and, Departments of School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
  • ,
  • Sharlene Teefey, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
  • ,
  • Jamie Menendez, RN

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
  • ,
  • Ken Yamaguchi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
  • ,
  • Leesa M. Galatz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Leesa M. Galatz, MD, Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Shoulder & Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Suite 11300 West Pavilion, One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, St Louis, MO 63110

published online 28 July 2006.

The purpose of this study was to document the subscapularis healing rate by use of postoperative ultrasound and correlate healing to physical examination findings. We included 23 patients (30 shoulders), who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty in the study. The evaluation included a standard history and physical examination, ultrasound evaluation, and outcome questionnaires. The postoperative examination included careful documentation of an abdominal-compression test to evaluate subscapularis function. All patients had an improvement in functional outcome scores and shoulder range of motion. Of 30 shoulders, 26 (87%) had an intact subscapularis as determined by ultrasound. By use of ultrasound as the gold standard, the abdominal-compression test had 7 false-positive results, 3 false-negative results, 19 true-negative results, and 1 true-positive result. The sensitivity of the abdominal-compression test was 25%, and the specificity was 73%. The negative predictive value was 86%, and the positive predictive value was 13%. The abdominal-compression test demonstrated a low sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value in this study for the assessment of subscapularis function after total shoulder arthroplasty. If a subscapularis tear is suspected in a patient after total shoulder arthroplasty, the abdominal-compression test is unreliable in predicting a subscapularis defect.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(05)00290-9

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.013

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 15, Issue 5 , Pages 541-548, September 2006