Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 6 , Pages 585-590, November 2005

Outcome of glenoid neck fractures

  • Alistair M. Pace, MD, MRCS

      Affiliations

    • Reading Shoulder Unit, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, England
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Alistair M. Pace, MD, MRCS, Flat 20, Millcroft Park, 322, Frankby Road, Greasby, Wirral, CH 49 3 PE
  • ,
  • Ranald Stuart, MBChB (FRCR)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, England
  • ,
  • Harry Brownlow, MD (FRCS)

      Affiliations

    • Reading Shoulder Unit, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, England

The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of extraarticular glenoid neck fractures with respect to glenoid neck malunion and rotator cuff injury. These fractures are often considered to have a favorable outcome if treated conservatively. More recent studies reveal that the outcome is not uniformly good, but the cause of poor outcomes has not been investigated. Our study identified 9 patients who had sustained a glenoid neck fracture of the scapula within the last 10 years and who were treated conservatively with immobilization and then early active motion. Their functional and anatomic outcomes were analyzed by clinical examination and validated scoring systems, including the Oxford questionnaire and Constant score. Plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging were correlated to outcome. None of the 9 patients were pain-free, and some had poor Oxford and Constant scores. Pain was associated with glenoid neck malunion and evidence of subacromial bursitis or rotator cuff tendinopathy (or both).

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(05)00106-0

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2005.03.004

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 6 , Pages 585-590, November 2005