Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 6 , Pages 570-574, November 2005

Quantifying shoulder rotation weakness in patients with shoulder impingement

  • Timothy F. Tyler, MSPT, ATC

      Affiliations

    • Nicholas Institute of Sports Medicine and Athletic Trauma, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
    • PRO Sports Physical Therapy of Westchester, New York, NY, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Timothy F. Tyler, MSPT, ATC, Nicholas Institute of Sports Medicine and Athletic Trauma, Lenox Hill Hospital, 130 E 77th St, New York, NY 10021.
  • ,
  • Rachael C. Nahow, DPT

      Affiliations

    • PRO Sports Physical Therapy of Westchester, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Stephen J. Nicholas, MD

      Affiliations

    • Nicholas Institute of Sports Medicine and Athletic Trauma, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Malachy P. McHugh, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Nicholas Institute of Sports Medicine and Athletic Trauma, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA

The purpose of this study was to determine whether strength deficits could be detected in individuals with and without shoulder impingement, all of whom had normal shoulder strength bilaterally according to grading of manual muscle testing. Strength of the internal rotators and external rotators was tested isokinetically at 60°/s and 180°/s, as well as manually with a handheld dynamometer (HHD) in 17 patients and 22 control subjects. Testing was performed with the shoulder positioned in the scapular plane and in 90° of shoulder abduction with 90° of elbow flexion (90-90). The peak torque was determined for each movement. The strength deficit between the involved and uninvolved arms (patients) and the dominant and nondominant arms (control subjects) was calculated for each subject. Comparisons were made for the scapular-plane and 90-90 positions between isokinetic and HHD testing. Despite a normal muscle grade, patients had marked weakness (28% deficit, P < .01) in external rotators at the 90-90 position tested with the HHD. In contrast, external rotator weakness was not evident with isokinetic testing at the 90-90 position (60°/s and 180°/s, 0% deficit, P = .99). In control subjects, greater internal rotator strength in the dominant compared with the nondominant arm was evident with the HHD at the 90-90 position (11%, P < .01) and in the scapular plane (7%, P < .05). Using an HHD while performing manual muscle testing can quantify shoulder strength deficits that may not be apparent with isokinetic testing. By using an HHD during shoulder testing, clinicians can identify weakness that may have been presumed normal.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(05)00105-9

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2005.03.003

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 6 , Pages 570-574, November 2005