Volume 14, Issue 6 , Pages 575-584, November 2005
Characterizing the effect of diagnosis on presenting deficits and outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty
This study compared self-assessed deficits in comfort, function, and health status before and after total shoulder arthroplasty for 4 different diagnoses: degenerative joint disease (DJD), secondary DJD (2°DJD), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and capsulorrhaphy arthropathy (CA). Deficits were assessed by the Simple Shoulder Test and Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires. There was a significant difference among diagnoses for preoperative and postoperative functional deficits. The profiles of improvement within the categories of comfort, motion, strength, and function were different for each diagnosis. Patients with DJD and CA were most improved in the category of motion, whereas those with 2°DJD and RA were most improved in the category of comfort. There was also a statistically significant difference in 5 of the 8 domains of the preoperative SF-36 among diagnoses. Factors associated with each diagnosis play a significant role in determining the magnitude of preoperative deficits and postoperative improvement in shoulder function.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
This work was supported by the Douglas T. Harryman II/DePuy Endowed Chair for Shoulder Research at the University of Washington.
PII: S1058-2746(05)00100-X
doi:10.1016/j.jse.2005.02.021
© 2005 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 14, Issue 6 , Pages 575-584, November 2005
