Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 1, Supplement , Pages S162-S167, January 2005

Initial glenoid component fixation in “reverse” total shoulder arthroplasty: A biomechanical evaluation

  • Melinda Harman, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, The BioMotion Foundation, West Palm Beach, FL, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Melinda K. Harman, MSc, Director of Research, The BioMotion Foundation, PO Box 248, Palm Beach, FL 33480-0248
  • ,
  • Mark Frankle, MD

      Affiliations

    • Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, FL, USA
  • ,
  • Matt Vasey, BSc

      Affiliations

    • Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, FL, USA
  • ,
  • Scott Banks, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, The BioMotion Foundation, West Palm Beach, FL, USA
    • Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

In patients with rotator cuff arthropathy, a “reverse” shoulder prosthesis resists glenohumeral subluxation and offers the potential for improved function. However, premature mechanical failure due to loosening is a concern with these devices. This in vitro study evaluates initial glenoid component fixation of 2 uncemented “reverse” prostheses during physiologic loading and determines the relationship among lateral offset of the glenosphere, fixation method, and motion. To simulate an excellent glenoid bone stock, a polyurethane foam bone with similar material properties to that of the glenoid cancellous bone was used. Both lateral offset and peripheral screw type affected the magnitude of baseplate motion. Baseplate motion for Delta III components and Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis (RSP) components fixed with 5.0-mm captured screws were below the 150 μm of motion generally accepted as the threshold for bone ingrowth. Stable fixation was achieved for the RSP-neutral components despite a substantially (69%) greater moment at the baseplate-foam interface compared with the Delta III. Obtaining similar results in vivo is partially dependent on surgical placement of the peripheral screws and the patient’s glenoid bone stock.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Caution-The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis is an investigational device limited by federal law to investigational use.Research grant funding was received from Encore Medical Corp (Austin, TX) and The BioMotion Foundation.

PII: S1058-2746(04)00291-5

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.030

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 1, Supplement , Pages S162-S167, January 2005