Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 3 , Pages 324-328, May 2005

The arthroscopic view of the glenohumeral ligaments compared with anatomy: Fold or fact?

  • Nicole Pouliart, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Academic Hospital, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
    • Department of Human Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Nicole Pouliart, MD, Academic Hospital Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Olivier J. Gagey, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Service d’orthopédie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Université Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
    • Institut d’Anatomie, Paris, France

In a morphologic cadaveric study with observational arthroscopy in living subjects, we tried to resolve the contradiction in the literature with regard to the nature of the glenohumeral ligaments and the difference in observation of the folds during arthroscopic and open surgery. Observation of morphology and functional anatomy of the glenohumeral capsule was performed in 200 non-embalmed cadavers through open dissection (100 specimens) and by arthroscopy (50 specimens) or both (50 specimens), as well as in 100 living subjects undergoing shoulder arthroscopy. In the resting arm position, folds and bands can be observed on the inside of the anteroinferior capsule. When the arm is moved into full abduction and external rotation, however, all bands progressively disappear from sight. The bands generally observed in the shoulder capsule during arthroscopy appear at the site of histologic reinforcements of the capsule but are not the capsular ligaments themselves, as they seem to disappear in certain positions of the humerus. Arthroscopically, it is, therefore, not possible to discern the exact limits of these ligaments. This may give rise to a certain amount of confusion when comparing clinical with anatomic and physiologic studies. On the other hand, their presence or absence in arthroscopic surgery might be of clinical relevance in evaluating capsular tension.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(04)00249-6

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2004.08.009

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 3 , Pages 324-328, May 2005