Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 1 , Pages 38-50, January 2005

Shoulder arthrodesis: Indications, technique, results, and complications

  • Oliver Rühmann (Privatdozent Dr Med)

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Oliver Rühmann, Privatdozent Dr med, Orthopaedic Department, Hannover Medical School, Anna-von-Borries-Strasse 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
  • ,
  • Stephan Schmolke (Dr Med)

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • ,
  • Michael Bohnsack (Privatdozent Dr Med)

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • ,
  • Christian Flamme (Privatdozent Dr Med)

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • ,
  • Carl Joachim Wirth (Professor Dr Med)

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Complications after shoulder arthrodesis are frequent. Through results and comparisons with the literature, the presented article analyzes the correlation of complications with the specific operative techniques, indications, and postoperative treatment. Between 1964 and 2001, a total of 43 cases of shoulder arthrodesis (13 screw and 30 plate arthrodeses) were performed and then analyzed after a mean of 6.7 years (range, 0.5–36 years). Surgery was carried out on 10 female patients (23%) and 33 male patients (77%) with a mean age of 35 years (range, 11–82 years). These patients had the following indications: paralysis (32 [74%]), osteoarthritis or humeral head necrosis (15 [35%]), infection (7 [16%]), and persistent shoulder instability (6 [14%]). The extent of active movement after arthrodesis was 56° abduction (range, 20°–90°) and 60° forward flexion (range, 20°–105°), with an increase in the Constant score in all cases, from a mean of 27 points preoperatively to 57 points postoperatively (difference, 30 points). The patients rated the outcome of surgery as excellent, good, or satisfactory in 91% of cases. Complications after shoulder arthrodesis were noted in 12 of 43 patients (28%). The most frequent complications after screw/plate arthrodesis included pseudarthrosis, 2 (15%)/3 (10%); infection, 1 (8%)/4 (13%); and fracture of the humerus, 0/4 (13%). No specific judgment can be attributed to the different osteosynthesis techniques used in shoulder arthrodesis, either in the cases presented at our clinic or in the literature. Pseudarthrosis appeared to be less frequent in cases of plate arthrodesis compared with screw arthrodesis. However, the application of plates resulted more often in infection, postoperative fractures of the humerus, and the necessity for removal of material. Particularly in patients with paralysis, a shoulder arthrodesis resulted in an improvement in postoperative active function and presented a suitable operative option.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(04)00155-7

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2004.05.008

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 1 , Pages 38-50, January 2005