Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 1 , Pages 51-59, January 2005

Primary stability of shoulder arthrodesis using cannulated cancellous screws

  • Oliver Rühmann, Privatdozent Dr med

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Oliver Rühmann, Privatdozent Dr med, Orthopaedic Department, Hannover Medical School, Anna-von-Borries-Strasse 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
  • ,
  • Ludger Kirsch

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
  • ,
  • Sara Büch

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
  • ,
  • Stephan Kirschner, Dr med

      Affiliations

    • Orthopädische Klinik König Ludwig Haus, Universitätsklinik Würzburg, Würzburg. Germany
  • ,
  • Michael Bohnsack, Privatdozent Dr med

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
  • ,
  • Carl Joachim Wirth, Professor Dr med

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

There are no biomechanical studies available concerned with the primary stability of shoulder arthrodesis. The aim of our biomechanical investigations was to ascertain a minimal material combination with high primary stability for shoulder arthrodesis. For that purpose, the primary stability of 6 different forms of screw arthrodesis was investigated under the stress of abduction, adduction, anteversion, and retroversion. The mean values of the screw arthrodeses were compared with those of a 16-hole plate arthrodesis. All tests were carried out on 24 human specimens without destruction by use of a materials testing machine. The most stable form of screw arthrodesis for the load directions of abduction, adduction, anteversion, and retroversion results from a specific configuration of screws comprising 3 horizontal humeroglenoid screws and 3 vertical acromiohumeral screws (318.5 ± 99.0 N). For three forms of arthrodesis, each with 3 humerus-glenoid screws (299.9 ± 95.4 N), no significant difference (P = .530) was found compared with a 16-hole plate arthrodesis (293.4 ± 89.3 N). The plate arthrodeses only achieved higher power values on abduction and adduction stress in comparison with screw arthrodesis with 3 humerus-glenoid screws. The difference was insignificant. Because arthrodesis with 3 humerus-glenoid screws was significantly more stable on stress of anteversion and retroversion, this particular screw arthrodesis is considered superior to plate arthrodeses. The use of the most stable form of screw arthrodesis may reduce nonunion.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(04)00154-5

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2004.05.007

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 1 , Pages 51-59, January 2005