Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 13, Issue 4 , Pages 427-433, July 2004

Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus

  • R Hertel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inselspital, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Ralph Hertel, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inselspital, University of Berne, 3010 Berne, Switzerland
  • ,
  • A Hempfing

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inselspital, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
  • ,
  • M Stiehler

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inselspital, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
  • ,
  • M Leunig

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inselspital, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland

Abstract 

The purpose of this study was to evaluate predictors of fracture-induced humeral head ischemia. Between February 1998 and December 2001, 100 intracapsular fractures of the proximal humerus, treated by open surgery, were included in a prospective surgical evaluation protocol (mean age, 60 years; minimum, 21 years; maximum, 88 years; 45 men; 57 right shoulders). Fracture morphology was assessed following a structured questionnaire and based on radiographic and intraoperative findings. Perfusion was assessed intraoperatively by observation of backflow after a borehole was drilled into the central part of the head in all shoulders and by intraosseous laser Doppler flowmetry in 46. Good predictors of ischemia were the length of the metaphyseal head extension (accuracy, 0.84 for calcar segments <8 mm), the integrity of the medial hinge (accuracy, 0.79 for disrupted hinge), and the basic fracture pattern (accuracy, 0.7 for combined types 2, 9, 10, 11, and 12). Moderate and poor predictors of ischemia were fractures consisting of four fragments (accuracy, 0.67), angular displacement of the head (accuracy, 0.62 for angulations over 45°), the amount of displacement of the tuberosities (accuracy, 0.61 for displacement over 10 mm), glenohumeral dislocation (accuracy, 0.49), head-split components (accuracy, 0.49), and fractures consisting of three fragments (accuracy, 0.38). When the above criteria (anatomic neck, short calcar, disrupted hinge) were combined, positive predictive values of up to 97% could be obtained. The most relevant predictors of ischemia were the length of the dorsomedial metaphyseal extension, the integrity of the medial hinge, and the basic fracture type determined with the binary description system.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(04)00079-5

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.034

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 13, Issue 4 , Pages 427-433, July 2004