Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 13, Issue 4 , Pages 434-440, July 2004

Five- to thirteen-year follow-up of the GSB III total elbow arthroplasty

  • Edward W Kelly, MD

      Affiliations

    • Minnesota Orthopedic Specialists, Minneapolis, MN, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Edward W. Kelly, MD, Minnesota Orthopedic Specialists, 701 25th Ave S, Suite 505, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA
  • ,
  • Jennifer Coghlan, BAppSci (Adv N), BA

      Affiliations

    • Melbourne Shoulder and Elbow Center, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • Simon Bell, FRCS, FRACS, FAOrthoA

      Affiliations

    • Melbourne Shoulder and Elbow Center, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract 

Between 1988 and 1995, the senior author performed total elbow arthroplasty in 28 elbows (23 patients) with the GSB III prosthesis. At the most recent follow-up, 7 patients had died (9 elbows) and 1 had the implant removed because of a deep infection. The remaining 18 elbows (15 patients) were available for clinical and radiographic review at a mean period of 7.6 years (range, 5.5-11.9 years). All 15 patients were satisfied with the results of their elbow replacement, with a mean Mayo elbow performance score of 91 (range, 75-100). The mean flexion/extension and supination/pronation arcs improved by 33° and 67°, respectively. Radiographic follow-up demonstrated progressive loosening in only 1 patient and no progressive loosening in those with an adequate cement technique. Mild or moderate lysis of the distal humeral or proximal ulnar components was noted in 10 elbows, and severe lysis of the distal humerus was seen in 1. Of the patients, 6 (21%) had mild complications: triceps avulsions in 3, superficial wound infections in 2, and an undisplaced fracture of the distal humeral medial condyle in 1. In 4 patients (14%) complications developed requiring reoperation, including exchange of the polyethylene bushing because of wear, debridement of synovitis, resection arthroplasty for deep infection, and exploration of an ulnar nerve palsy. In 2 additional patients (7%), persistent ulnar nerve paresthesias developed postoperatively. Of the 28 elbow replacements performed with the GSB III prosthesis, only 1 required revision because of loosening at a mean follow-up of 7.6 years. The results of this series of GSB III elbow replacements in patients with rheumatoid arthritis demonstrate reasonable survivorship of this prosthesis.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1058-2746(04)00045-X

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.028

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 13, Issue 4 , Pages 434-440, July 2004