Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 10, Issue 4 , Pages 340-352, July 2001

Anterior-inferior capsular shift of the shoulder: A biomechanical comparison of glenoid-based versus humeral-based shift strategies

Presented at the Fourteenth Open Meeting of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, New Orleans, La, March 28, 1998, and at the Sixty-fifth Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, New Orleans, La, March 25-29, 1998.

Houston, Tex, and Cleveland, Ohio

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kelsey Seybold Clinic, Houston, Tex,a and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.b

Abstract 

This study compared the biomechanical effects of an anterior-inferior capsular shift based at the humeral side with one on the glenoid side of the joint on resultant multidirectional glenohumeral translation and rotation. Nine matched pairs of fresh cadaveric shoulders were placed in a testing apparatus that constrained 3 rotations but allowed simultaneous free translation of the humeral head with respect to the glenoid. The right and left shoulders of each of the matched pairs were randomized to undergo either a glenoid-based or humeral-based anterior capsular shift. The shoulders were tested vented and following the capsular shift procedure. Translational testing was performed at 0°, 45°, and 90° of glenohumeral elevation with the humerus in neutral rotation, 30° internal rotation, and 30° external rotation. Sequential loads of 30 N in anterior, posterior, and inferior directions were applied while maintaining a 22-N joint compressive load. The maximum arc of internal and external rotation after application of a 1-newton-meter moment was determined for the vented specimens and then after the capsular shift procedure. Both shift strategies resulted in significant limitation of anterior, posterior, and inferior translation in all of the tested positions. No significant differences were noted between the 2 shift strategies with respect to restriction of translation in the anterior or inferior directions. The glenoid-based shift caused a significantly greater decrease in posterior translation at 45° and 90° of abduction. With respect to rotation, the glenoid-based shift exerted significantly greater restriction on external rotation than the humeral-based shift. This study supports the use of either a humeral-based or glenoid-based shift to control multidirectional glenohumeral instability. Greater reduction in external rotation was demonstrated after the glenoid-based shift. Specific differences demonstrated in translation control for humeral-based versus glenoid-based capsular shift procedures may be useful in tailoring a procedure for specific instability patterns. (J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001;10:340-52.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Reprint requests: Allen Deutsch, MD, Kelsey Seybold Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2727 W Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77025.

PII: S1058-2746(01)21876-X

doi:10.1067/mse.2001.115365

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 10, Issue 4 , Pages 340-352, July 2001