Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 9, Issue 6 , Pages 465-469, November 2000

Correlates with comfort and function after total shoulder arthroplasty for degenerative joint disease☆☆

Seattle, Wash

From the Department of Orthopaedics, University of Washington, Seattle

Abstract 

Although most patients are improved after shoulder arthroplasty, the degree of improvement is variable. The factors contributing to this variability are not well understood. In particular, little information is available regarding the preoperative characteristics of the patient that may influence the quality of the result. This study correlated patient demographics, preoperative health status, and preoperative shoulder function with 3 outcome metrics: comfort, physical role function, and shoulder-specific function. One hundred thirty-four shoulders having total shoulder arthroplasty for degenerative glenohumeral joint disease had an average follow-up of 3.4 ± 1.8 years. The SF-36 Comfort score improved from 39 to 61 (P < .0001). The SF-36 Physical Role Function score improved from 30 to 52 (P < .0001). The average number of Simple Shoulder Test functions performable (out of 12) improved from 4 to 9 (P < .0001). The strongest correlates with postoperative comfort included preoperative physical function (P < .0001), general health (P < .0001), and social function (P < .001). The strongest correlates with postoperative physical role function included preoperative physical function (P < .0001) and general health (P < .001). The strongest correlates with postoperative shoulder function included male gender (P < .0001), and preoperative physical function (P < .0001), social function (P < .0001), mental health (P < .0001) and shoulder function (P < .0001). These data indicate that the overall well-being of the patient before surgery is strongly correlated with the quality of the outcome from total shoulder arthroplasty for degenerative glenohumeral joint disease. (J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2000;9:465-9.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This research was supported by the Douglas T. Harryman II/DePuy Endowed Chair for Shoulder Research at the University of Washington, the Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation, and the Bristol-Myers Squibb/Zimmer Institutional Award for Excellence in Orthopaedic Research.

☆☆ Reprint requests: Frederick Matsen III, MD, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Washington, Box 356500, 1959 NE Pacific, Seattle, WA 98195-6500.

 J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2000;9:465-9

PII: S1058-2746(00)64215-5

doi:10.1067/mse.2000.109323

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 9, Issue 6 , Pages 465-469, November 2000