Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 10, Issue 4 , Pages 327-332, July 2001

Glenoid size, inclination, and version: An anatomic study

Seattle, Wash, and Cleveland, Ohio

From the Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle,a and Section of Adult Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,b and Department of Bio-Medical Engineering,c Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Abstract 

Three hundred forty-four human scapular bones (172 matched pairs) were measured for their glenoid height, width, inclination, and version. The sample consisted of 50 black men, 50 white men, 50 black women, and 22 white women, all of whom were aged 20 to 30 years at the time of death. The mean age of the study group was 25.6 years. No difference in glenoid size was noted between black and white patients. The overall glenoid version for the entire study group was 1.23° of retroversion. The difference in glenoid version between black and white patients was statistically significant. The average glenoid version for black and white patients measured 0.20° and 2.65° of retroversion, respectively (P = .000014). Specifically, the glenoid version for black and white men measured 0.11° and 2.87° of retroversion, respectively (P = .00034). The glenoid version for black and white women measured 0.30° and 2.16° of retroversion, respectively (P = .034). No statistical difference in glenoid version was found between men and women of the same race. No difference was found between measuring the glenoid version based on the transverse axis of the scapula and measuring the glenoid version perpendicular to the glenohumeral joint. No statistical difference was found in the glenoid inclination based on race or sex. The relationships between glenoid size, inclination, and version are important to understand when a surgeon prepares to resurface the glenoid during total shoulder arthroplasty. The knowledge of these values, their variation, and racial differences should help reproduce a more anatomical result. (J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001;10:327-32.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Reprint requests: John J. Brems, MD, Section of Adult Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, A41, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195.

PII: S1058-2746(01)55162-9

doi:10.1067/mse.2001.115269

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 10, Issue 4 , Pages 327-332, July 2001